Bining Zhao

12 papers receiving 383 citations

Peers

Bining Zhao
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • General Energy 30
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 89
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 320
  • Control and Systems Engineering 88
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 21
Replace Ahmed Rabee Sayed with:
Ahmed Rabee Sayed China
Chaoxian Lv China
John MacCormack Canada
Hassan Barati Iran
Hao Cong China
Lixun Chi China
M.J. Vahid-Pakdel Iran
Ricardo Alberto Hincapié Isaza Colombia
Harold Salazar Colombia
Can Wang China
Bining Zhao relative to Ahmed Rabee Sayed China Ahmed Rabee Sayed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Ahmed Rabee Sayed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bining Zhao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bining Zhao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bining Zhao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bining Zhao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bining Zhao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bining Zhao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bining Zhao. The network helps show where Bining Zhao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Bining Zhao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bining Zhao Line = papers co-authored together Bining Zhao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2017125
2 2016101
3 201854
4 201838
5 202116
6 202315
7 202012
8 202110
9 20249
10 20175
11 20222
12 20251

About Bining Zhao

Bining Zhao is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Economics and Econometrics, Reproductive Medicine and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 12 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (7 papers), Electric Power System Optimization (5 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (3 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers), Smart Grid Security and Resilience (2 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (1 paper), Energy and Environment Impacts (1 paper) and Energy Efficiency and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Energy (30 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (89 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (320 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (88 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (21 citations). Bining Zhao has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Antonio J. Conejo, Ramteen Sioshansi, Anatoly Zlotnik, Aleksandr Rudkevich, Rick S. Blum, Shalinee Kishore, Alberto J. Lamadrid, Jihong Kang, Mort Webster and Wenpei Bai. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Environmental Science & Technology, Antioxidants, Cell Communication and Signaling and International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact