Bill King

887 total citations
31 papers, 698 citations indexed

About

Bill King is a scholar working on Physiology, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Bill King has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 698 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Physiology, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Bill King's work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (25 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (5 papers). Bill King is often cited by papers focused on Smoking Behavior and Cessation (25 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (5 papers). Bill King collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Bill King's co-authors include Ron Borland, David Hammond, Richard J. O’Connor, Ann McNeill, K. Michael Cummings, Geoffrey T. Fong, Hua‐Hie Yong, Tara Elton‐Marshall, K. Michael Cummings and Christian Boudreau and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Environmental Health Perspectives and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Bill King

31 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bill King Australia 16 502 191 148 104 87 31 698
Farahnaz Islam United States 14 567 1.1× 173 0.9× 134 0.9× 137 1.3× 60 0.7× 20 803
Christine D Czoli Canada 17 667 1.3× 418 2.2× 116 0.8× 163 1.6× 145 1.7× 24 1.0k
Amy L. Nyman United States 16 480 1.0× 174 0.9× 110 0.7× 142 1.4× 88 1.0× 29 595
Lauren Kass Lempert United States 14 483 1.0× 256 1.3× 67 0.5× 139 1.3× 48 0.6× 28 652
Shari P. Feirman United States 14 831 1.7× 391 2.0× 127 0.9× 223 2.1× 72 0.8× 19 1.0k
Greg Connolly United States 11 659 1.3× 214 1.1× 239 1.6× 95 0.9× 47 0.5× 19 925
Andrew Anesetti‐Rothermel United States 15 548 1.1× 223 1.2× 178 1.2× 118 1.1× 96 1.1× 33 800
Nada Kassem United States 12 189 0.4× 194 1.0× 111 0.8× 96 0.9× 85 1.0× 26 625
Conrad J. Choinière United States 13 569 1.1× 299 1.6× 102 0.7× 256 2.5× 80 0.9× 17 770
Doris G Gammon United States 14 629 1.3× 351 1.8× 131 0.9× 101 1.0× 24 0.3× 29 732

Countries citing papers authored by Bill King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bill King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bill King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill King. The network helps show where Bill King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bill King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bill King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bill King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bill King. Bill King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
King, Bill, Ron Borland, Kylie Morphett, et al.. (2021). ‘It’s all the other stuff!’ How smokers understand (and misunderstand) chemicals in cigarettes and cigarette smoke. Public Understanding of Science. 30(6). 777–796. 6 indexed citations
3.
King, Bill, Ron Borland, Michael Le Grande, et al.. (2021). Smokers’ awareness of filter ventilation, and how they believe it affects them: findings from the ITC Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control. 32(1). 93–98. 5 indexed citations
5.
Borland, Ron, Lin Li, K. Michael Cummings, et al.. (2012). Effects of a Fact Sheet on beliefs about the harmfulness of alternative nicotine delivery systems compared with cigarettes. Harm Reduction Journal. 9(1). 19–19. 16 indexed citations
6.
King, Bill, Victoria White, James Balmford, Jae Cooper, & Ron Borland. (2012). The Decline of Menthol Cigarette Smoking in Australia, 1980-2008. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 14(10). 1213–1220. 3 indexed citations
7.
Yong, Hua‐Hie, Ron Borland, K. Michael Cummings, et al.. (2011). Impact of the removal of misleading terms on cigarette pack on smokers' beliefs about ‘light/mild’ cigarettes: cross‐country comparisons. Addiction. 106(12). 2204–2213. 51 indexed citations
8.
Borland, Ron, et al.. (2011). The acceptability of nicotine containing products as alternatives to cigarettes: findings from two pilot studies. Harm Reduction Journal. 8(1). 27–27. 7 indexed citations
9.
Elton‐Marshall, Tara, Geoffrey T. Fong, Mark P. Zanna, et al.. (2010). Beliefs about the relative harm of “light” and “low tar” cigarettes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) China Survey. Tobacco Control. 19(Suppl 2). i54–i62. 37 indexed citations
10.
Fix, Brian V., Richard J. O’Connor, David Hammond, et al.. (2010). ITC “spit and butts” pilot study: The feasibility of collecting saliva and cigarette butt samples from smokers to evaluate policy. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 12(3). 185–190. 9 indexed citations
11.
Ashley, David L., Richard J. O’Connor, John T. Bernert, et al.. (2010). Effect of Differing Levels of Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines in Cigarette Smoke on the Levels of Biomarkers in Smokers. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 19(6). 1389–1398. 49 indexed citations
12.
King, Bill, Ron Borland, Gregory Polzin, et al.. (2010). Divergence between strength indicators in packaging and cigarette engineering: a case study of Marlboro varieties in Australia and the USA. Tobacco Control. 19(5). 398–402. 11 indexed citations
13.
King, Bill, R. Borland, M. Omar, et al.. (2010). Malaysian and Thai smokers' beliefs about the harmfulness of ‘light’ and menthol cigarettes. Tobacco Control. 19(6). 444–450. 15 indexed citations
14.
Shahab, Lion, David Hammond, Richard J. O’Connor, et al.. (2008). The reliability and validity of self-reported puffing behavior: Evidence from a cross-national study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 10(5). 867–874. 24 indexed citations
15.
16.
King, Bill, Ron Borland, & Jefferson Fowles. (2007). Mainstream smoke emissions of Australian and Canadian cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 9(8). 835–844. 17 indexed citations
17.
O’Connor, Richard J., Ann McNeill, Ron Borland, et al.. (2007). Smokers' beliefs about the relative safety of other tobacco products: Findings from the ITC Collaboration. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 9(10). 1033–1042. 96 indexed citations
18.
King, Bill & Ron Borland. (2004). The "low-tar" strategy and the changing construction of Australian cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 6(1). 85–94. 19 indexed citations
19.
King, Bill, et al.. (2000). Review of the implications of changes in EU pesticides legislation on the production and export of fruits and vegetables from developing country suppliers. Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich). 21 indexed citations
20.
Baghurst, Peter, E. F. Robertson, Bill King, et al.. (1991). Lead in the placenta, membranes, and umbilical cord in relation to pregnancy outcome in a lead-smelter community.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 90. 315–320. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026