Bill Ding

471 total citations
10 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

Bill Ding is a scholar working on Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Bill Ding has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Finance, 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 4 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Bill Ding's work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (8 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (3 papers). Bill Ding is often cited by papers focused on Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (8 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (3 papers). Bill Ding collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Belgium. Bill Ding's co-authors include Russ Wermers, Hany A. Shawky, Bing Liang, Mila Getmansky, Mila Getmansky Sherman, Shin‐ichi Urayama, Koji Fujimoto, Nobukatsu Sawamoto, Ryōsuke Takahashi and Hirotaka Onoe and has published in prestigious journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Journal of Banking & Finance and European Financial Management.

In The Last Decade

Bill Ding

10 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Bill Ding United States	8	272	184	116	24	24	10	301
Kevin M. Johnson United States	5	282 1.0×	204 1.1×	118 1.0×	27 1.1×	20 0.8×	10	302
Blake Phillips Canada	9	218 0.8×	156 0.8×	98 0.8×	19 0.8×	22 0.9×	19	259
Alexander Barinov United States	10	231 0.8×	128 0.7×	143 1.2×	31 1.3×	31 1.3×	26	267
Jahanara Zaman United States	4	306 1.1×	216 1.2×	114 1.0×	23 1.0×	17 0.7×	4	327
Lubomir Petrasek United States	10	252 0.9×	179 1.0×	115 1.0×	29 1.2×	17 0.7×	32	289
Michael S. McCorry Australia	3	264 1.0×	223 1.2×	85 0.7×	25 1.0×	17 0.7×	7	285
Yinghui Yu Hong Kong	3	361 1.3×	296 1.6×	134 1.2×	32 1.3×	23 1.0×	4	401
Kenneth Khang United States	6	285 1.0×	208 1.1×	116 1.0×	30 1.3×	50 2.1×	16	346
Florian Nagler Italy	8	286 1.1×	150 0.8×	106 0.9×	24 1.0×	16 0.7×	18	328
Ryan Taliaferro United States	7	236 0.9×	135 0.7×	112 1.0×	43 1.8×	30 1.3×	17	259

Countries citing papers authored by Bill Ding

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bill Ding

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Ding. The network helps show where Bill Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bill Ding

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bill Ding. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bill Ding based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bill Ding. Bill Ding is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Okada, Tomohisa, Bill Ding, Shin‐ichi Urayama, et al.. (2021). Insertable inductively coupled volumetric coils for MR microscopy in a human 7T MR system. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 87(3). 1613–1620. 8 indexed citations

2.

Ding, Bill, Mila Getmansky, Bing Liang, & Russ Wermers. (2009). Share Restrictions and Investor Flows in the Hedge Fund Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal. 44 indexed citations

3.

Ding, Bill, et al.. (2008). Liquidity Shocks, Size and the Relative Performance of Hedge Fund Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations

4.

Ding, Bill, et al.. (2008). Liquidity shocks, size and the relative performance of hedge fund strategies. Journal of Banking & Finance. 33(5). 883–891. 29 indexed citations

5.

Ding, Bill, Mila Getmansky Sherman, Bing Liang, & Russ Wermers. (2007). Hedge Fund Flows and Contagion in Financial Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

6.

Ding, Bill & Hany A. Shawky. (2007). The Performance of Hedge Fund Strategies and the Asymmetry of Return Distributions. European Financial Management. 13(2). 309–331. 48 indexed citations

7.

Ding, Bill, Mila Getmansky, Bing Liang, & Russ Wermers. (2007). Investor Flows and Fund Restrictions in the Hedge Fund Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal. 51 indexed citations

8.

Ding, Bill. (2006). Mutual Fund Mergers: A Long-Term Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. 16 indexed citations

9.

Ding, Bill, Mila Getmansky Sherman, Bing Liang, & Russ Wermers. (2005). Market Impact, Investor Flows, and the Structure of Hedge Fund Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

10.

Ding, Bill & Russ Wermers. (2005). Mutual Fund Performance and Governance Structure: The Role of Portfolio Managers and Boards of Directors. SSRN Electronic Journal. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact