Bill Davies
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Law top 5%
- Strategy and Management
- Sociology and Political Science
- Finance
- Co-authors
- Morten RasmussenM. Neil ReaumeStephanie PickMichael Fung‐Kee‐FungDavid J. StewartKatelyn BalchinRobert M. MacRaeJason Pantarotto
- Topics
- European and International Law Studies (10 papers)Law and Political Science (4 papers)European Union Policy and Governance (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Bill Davies
13 papers receiving 99 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Political Science and International Relations 89
- Law 34
- Strategy and Management 21
- Sociology and Political Science 11
- Finance 10
Countries citing papers authored by Bill Davies
This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Davies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Davies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Davies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bill Davies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Davies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Davies. The network helps show where Bill Davies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bill Davies
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bill Davies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bill Davies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bill Davies. Bill Davies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | Lessons from Germany: Tenant power in the rental market | 5 |
| 4 | German model homes? A comparison of the UK and German housing markets | 2 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | Why EU Legal History Matters--A Historian's Response | 1 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | Dealing with the Fallout: West Germany's Response to the Solange Decision (1974). ACES Working Papers, 2011 | 1 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 7 |
About Bill Davies
Bill Davies is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Finance, having authored 17 papers that have together received 113 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European and International Law Studies (10 papers), Law and Political Science (4 papers) and European Union Policy and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (89 citations), Law (34 citations) and Strategy and Management (21 citations). Bill Davies has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Morten Rasmussen, M. Neil Reaume, Stephanie Pick, Michael Fung‐Kee‐Fung, David J. Stewart, Katelyn Balchin, Robert M. MacRae, Jason Pantarotto and Julie Renaud. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, West European Politics and Current Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.