Bilge Karaçalı

1.2k citations
58 papers · 888 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Bilge Karaçalı

53 papers receiving 843 citations

Peers

Bilge Karaçalı
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 387
  • Neurology 94
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 38
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 233
  • Biophysics 56
Replace Lopamudra Mukherjee with:
Lopamudra Mukherjee United States
Tammy Riklin Raviv Israel
Suyash P. Awate United States
Noah Lee United States
Mehul Sampat United States
Sunanda Mitra United States
Jacob Furst United States
Xiaolan Zeng United States
Vinh‐Thong Ta France
Stéphanie Allassonnière France
Bilge Karaçalı relative to Lopamudra Mukherjee United States Lopamudra Mukherjee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Lopamudra Mukherjee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bilge Karaçalı

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bilge Karaçalı's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bilge Karaçalı with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bilge Karaçalı more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bilge Karaçalı

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bilge Karaçalı. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bilge Karaçalı. The network helps show where Bilge Karaçalı may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bilge Karaçalı, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bilge Karaçalı Line = papers co-authored together Bilge Karaçalı links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003263
2 200667
3 200452
4 200651
5 200735
6 200330
7 200327
8 200327
9 200421
10 200621
11 201620
12 200720
13 200620
14 201318
15 200718
16 200216
17 200515
18 201014
19 200313
20 201912

About Bilge Karaçalı

Bilge Karaçalı is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 58 papers that have together received 888 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (12 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (9 papers), Network Traffic and Congestion Control (7 papers), Software-Defined Networks and 5G (6 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (6 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (6 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (6 papers) and AI in cancer detection (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (387 citations), Neurology (94 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (38 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (233 citations) and Biophysics (56 citations). Bilge Karaçalı has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Bermuda. Frequent co-authors include Christos Davatzikos, Dinggang Shen, Zhong Xue, Zhiqiang Lao, Susan M. Resnick, Aydın Tözeren, Wesley E. Snyder, Hamid Krim, W.E. Snyder and David A. Rottenberg. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, International Journal of Computer Vision, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control and Journal of New Music Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact