Bianca Lauria-Horner
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Pharmacology
- Co-authors
- Robert PohlScott B. PattenStephanie KnaakStan KutcherDorothy LuongKeith S. DobsonHeather StuartShu‐Ping Chen
- Topics
- Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers)Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesChile
In The Last Decade
Bianca Lauria-Horner
12 papers receiving 336 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Social Psychology 159
- Clinical Psychology 124
- General Health Professions 109
- Psychiatry and Mental health 57
- Pharmacology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Bianca Lauria-Horner
This map shows the geographic impact of Bianca Lauria-Horner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bianca Lauria-Horner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bianca Lauria-Horner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bianca Lauria-Horner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bianca Lauria-Horner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bianca Lauria-Horner. The network helps show where Bianca Lauria-Horner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bianca Lauria-Horner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bianca Lauria-Horner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bianca Lauria-Horner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bianca Lauria-Horner. Bianca Lauria-Horner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | Opening Minds: The Mental Health Commission of Canada’s Anti-Stigma Initiative: Opening Minds in Canada: Targeting Change | 1 |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 73 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 126 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 15 |
About Bianca Lauria-Horner
Bianca Lauria-Horner is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (159 citations), Clinical Psychology (124 citations) and General Health Professions (109 citations). Bianca Lauria-Horner has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Robert Pohl, Scott B. Patten, Stephanie Knaak, Stan Kutcher, Dorothy Luong, Keith S. Dobson, Heather Stuart, Shu‐Ping Chen, Sarah J. Brooks and Michelle Koller. Their work appears in journals such as The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology and CNS Drugs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.