Bhargavi Nagendra
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Naren P. RaoArpitha JacobShivarama VaramballyGanesan VenkatasubramanianShyam Vasudeva RaoAbhishek AppajiTos T. J. M. BerendschotCarroll A.B. Webers
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Affective DisordersSchizophrenia Bulletin
- Partner nations
- IndiaNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Bhargavi Nagendra
14 papers receiving 245 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 97
- Psychiatry and Mental health 84
- Ophthalmology 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 61
- Clinical Psychology 29
Countries citing papers authored by Bhargavi Nagendra
This map shows the geographic impact of Bhargavi Nagendra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bhargavi Nagendra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bhargavi Nagendra more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bhargavi Nagendra
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bhargavi Nagendra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bhargavi Nagendra. The network helps show where Bhargavi Nagendra may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bhargavi Nagendra
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bhargavi Nagendra. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bhargavi Nagendra based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bhargavi Nagendra. Bhargavi Nagendra is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 27 |
About Bhargavi Nagendra
Bhargavi Nagendra is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Ophthalmology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (69 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (84 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (13 citations). Bhargavi Nagendra has collaborated with scholars based in India, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Naren P. Rao, Arpitha Jacob, Shivarama Varambally, Ganesan Venkatasubramanian, Shyam Vasudeva Rao, Abhishek Appaji, Tos T. J. M. Berendschot, Carroll A.B. Webers, Kesavan Muralidharan and Ranjini Garani Ramesh. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.