Beverly Ehrich

983 total citations
17 papers, 893 citations indexed

About

Beverly Ehrich is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Beverly Ehrich has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 893 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Oncology, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Beverly Ehrich's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (16 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers). Beverly Ehrich is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (16 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers). Beverly Ehrich collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Beverly Ehrich's co-authors include William Rakowski, Deborah N. Pearlman, Melissa A. Clark, Barbara K. Rimer, Melissa A. Clark, Michael G. Goldstein, Wayne F. Velicer, Catherine Dubé, David S. Pearlman and Isaac M. Lipkus and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Preventive Medicine and Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Beverly Ehrich

17 papers receiving 858 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Beverly Ehrich United States 13 634 298 215 170 109 17 893
Eunice S. King United States 13 676 1.1× 345 1.2× 153 0.7× 155 0.9× 41 0.4× 19 958
Tara S. Strigo United States 17 534 0.8× 290 1.0× 84 0.4× 260 1.5× 98 0.9× 31 991
Wenchi Liang United States 16 556 0.9× 401 1.3× 206 1.0× 79 0.5× 48 0.4× 27 998
Benita Weathers United States 21 260 0.4× 305 1.0× 194 0.9× 273 1.6× 48 0.4× 42 1.0k
Carolyn Anderman United States 12 281 0.4× 242 0.8× 85 0.4× 90 0.5× 30 0.3× 15 688
Elmer Huerta United States 16 266 0.4× 291 1.0× 91 0.4× 92 0.5× 24 0.2× 23 745
Evelinn A. Borrayo United States 17 281 0.4× 300 1.0× 94 0.4× 45 0.3× 33 0.3× 35 738
Rosemarie Henson United States 11 343 0.5× 132 0.4× 166 0.8× 30 0.2× 57 0.5× 16 812
Kipling J. Gallion United States 19 273 0.4× 263 0.9× 54 0.3× 102 0.6× 43 0.4× 36 768
Brenda C. Kluhsman United States 14 629 1.0× 138 0.5× 143 0.7× 44 0.3× 31 0.3× 20 981

Countries citing papers authored by Beverly Ehrich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beverly Ehrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beverly Ehrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beverly Ehrich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beverly Ehrich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beverly Ehrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beverly Ehrich. The network helps show where Beverly Ehrich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beverly Ehrich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beverly Ehrich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beverly Ehrich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beverly Ehrich. Beverly Ehrich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Rakowski, William, Isaac M. Lipkus, Melissa A. Clark, et al.. (2003). Reminder letter, tailored stepped-care, and self-choice comparison for repeat mammography. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 25(4). 308–314. 33 indexed citations
2.
Clark, Melissa A., William Rakowski, Beverly Ehrich, et al.. (2002). The effect of a stage-matched and tailored intervention on repeat mammography1 1The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajpmonline.. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 22(1). 1–7. 48 indexed citations
3.
Clark, Melissa A., William Rakowski, & Beverly Ehrich. (2000). Breast and cervical cancer screening: associations with personal, spouse's, and combined smoking status.. PubMed. 9(5). 513–6. 21 indexed citations
4.
Rakowski, William, Melissa A. Clark, & Beverly Ehrich. (1999). Smoking and Cancer Screening for Women Ages 42–75: Associations in the 1990–1994 National Health Interview Surveys. Preventive Medicine. 29(6). 487–495. 64 indexed citations
5.
Pearlman, Deborah N., Melissa A. Clark, William Rakowski, & Beverly Ehrich. (1999). Screening for Breast and Cervical Cancers: The Importance of Knowledge and Perceived Cancer Survivability. Women & Health. 28(4). 93–112. 115 indexed citations
6.
Rakowski, William, Beverly Ehrich, Michael G. Goldstein, et al.. (1998). Increasing Mammography among Women Aged 40–74 by Use of a Stage-Matched, Tailored Intervention. Preventive Medicine. 27(5). 748–756. 191 indexed citations
7.
Clark, Melissa A., William Rakowski, Beverly Ehrich, et al.. (1998). Stages of Adopting Regular Screening Mammography. Journal of Health Psychology. 3(4). 491–506. 10 indexed citations
8.
Ehrich, Beverly, Melissa A. Clark, William Rakowski, & Sandra J. Allison. (1998). Implementing a computer-based mammography education project in a managed care setting.. PubMed. 81(3). 79–82. 1 indexed citations
9.
Rakowski, William, Melissa A. Clark, Deborah N. Pearlman, et al.. (1997). Integrating Pros and Cons for Mammography and Pap Testing: Extending the Construct of Decisional Balance to Two Behaviors. Preventive Medicine. 26(5). 664–673. 50 indexed citations
10.
Pearlman, Deborah N., William Rakowski, Melissa A. Clark, et al.. (1997). Why do women's attitudes toward mammography change over time? Implications for physician-patient communication.. PubMed. 6(6). 451–7. 27 indexed citations
11.
Rakowski, William, Beverly Ehrich, Catherine Dubé, et al.. (1996). Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 18(2). 91–100. 78 indexed citations
12.
Pearlman, Deborah N., William Rakowski, & Beverly Ehrich. (1996). Mammography, clinical breast exam, and pap testing: correlates of combined screening.. PubMed. 12(1). 52–64. 35 indexed citations
13.
Pearlman, Deborah N., William Rakowski, & Beverly Ehrich. (1996). Mammography, Clinical Breast Exam, and Pap Testing: Correlates of Combined Screening. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 12(1). 57–64. 24 indexed citations
14.
Pearlman, Deborah N., William Rakowski, Beverly Ehrich, & Melissa A. Clark. (1996). Breast Cancer Screening Practices Among Black, Hispanic, and White Women: Reassessing Differences. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 12(5). 327–337. 128 indexed citations
15.
Rakowski, William, David S. Pearlman, Barbara K. Rimer, & Beverly Ehrich. (1995). Correlates of Mammography among Women with Low and High Socioeconomic Resources. Preventive Medicine. 24(2). 149–158. 52 indexed citations
16.
Pearlman, Deborah N., William Rakowski, & Beverly Ehrich. (1995). The Information Environment of Women and Mammography Screening: Assessing Reciprocity in Social Relationships. Journal of women's health. 4(5). 541–553. 9 indexed citations
17.
Ehrich, Beverly, et al.. (1994). Snuffing it Out: A Smokeless Tobacco Intervention with Athletes at a Small Private College. Journal of American College Health. 43(1). 27–30. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026