Betha Lusiana
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Forestry top 0.5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Soil Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Meine van NoordwijkBeria LeimonaKurniatun HairiahGeorg CadischAndree EkadinataSonya DewiRachmat MuliaElok Mulyoutami
- Topics
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (14 papers)Forest Management and Policy (7 papers)Land Use and Ecosystem Services (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndonesiaKenyaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Betha Lusiana
32 papers receiving 757 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Global and Planetary Change 427
- Forestry 213
- Ecology 153
- Soil Science 101
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 97
Countries citing papers authored by Betha Lusiana
This map shows the geographic impact of Betha Lusiana's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Betha Lusiana with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Betha Lusiana more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Betha Lusiana
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Betha Lusiana. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Betha Lusiana. The network helps show where Betha Lusiana may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Betha Lusiana
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Betha Lusiana. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Betha Lusiana based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Betha Lusiana. Betha Lusiana is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 51 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | Rewarding Communities for Keeping Rivers Clean? First Steps in a RiverCare Program in West Lampung- Indonesia | 0 |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | Economic potential of land-use change and forestry for carbon sequestration and poverty reduction | 7 |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | FALLOW model: assessment tool for landscape level impact of farmer land use choices | 3 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Tree-soil-crop interactions in sequential and simultaneous agroforestry systems. | 13 |
About Betha Lusiana
Betha Lusiana is a scholar working on Horticulture, Forestry and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 34 papers that have together received 800 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (14 papers), Forest Management and Policy (7 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (213 citations), Horticulture (42 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (427 citations). Betha Lusiana has collaborated with scholars based in Indonesia, Kenya and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Meine van Noordwijk, Beria Leimona, Kurniatun Hairiah, Georg Cadisch, Andree Ekadinata, Sonya Dewi, Rachmat Mulia, Elok Mulyoutami, Sacha Amaruzaman and Peter A. Minang. Their work appears in journals such as Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Sustainability and Field Crops Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.