Beth Goldberg

1.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
19 papers, 664 citations indexed

About

Beth Goldberg is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Beth Goldberg has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 664 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 7 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Beth Goldberg's work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (12 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (8 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). Beth Goldberg is often cited by papers focused on Misinformation and Its Impacts (12 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (8 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). Beth Goldberg collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Beth Goldberg's co-authors include Cynthia Miller‐Idriss, Brian Hughes, Rachael Piltch‐Loeb, Elena Savoia, Stephan Lewandowsky, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander van der Linden, Marcia A. Testa, Steve Rathje and Nicolás Velásquez and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Beth Goldberg

16 papers receiving 648 citations

Hit Papers

Psychological inoculation improves resilience against mis... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 2025 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Beth Goldberg United States 9 456 319 128 122 108 19 664
Tonmoy Sarkar Australia 2 636 1.4× 437 1.4× 125 1.0× 167 1.4× 204 1.9× 4 1.0k
Rhys Leahy United States 7 481 1.1× 322 1.0× 128 1.0× 231 1.9× 100 0.9× 10 751
Nicholas J. Restrepo United States 8 497 1.1× 326 1.0× 130 1.0× 234 1.9× 101 0.9× 15 775
Sazzad Hossain Khan Bangladesh 5 640 1.4× 457 1.4× 125 1.0× 167 1.4× 214 2.0× 8 1.0k
James Henry Rubin United Kingdom 6 486 1.1× 233 0.7× 108 0.8× 98 0.8× 39 0.4× 19 717
Nicholas Gabriel United States 4 362 0.8× 286 0.9× 59 0.5× 147 1.2× 94 0.9× 6 557
Alexandra Budenz United States 9 409 0.9× 512 1.6× 62 0.5× 100 0.8× 141 1.3× 19 806
Molly B. El Alam United States 7 461 1.0× 177 0.6× 141 1.1× 156 1.3× 35 0.3× 14 669
Viktor Orri Valgarðsson United Kingdom 8 405 0.9× 359 1.1× 89 0.7× 58 0.5× 109 1.0× 20 674
Jeanette B. Ruiz United States 13 455 1.0× 647 2.0× 68 0.5× 94 0.8× 248 2.3× 21 873

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Goldberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Goldberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Goldberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Goldberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Goldberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Goldberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Goldberg. The network helps show where Beth Goldberg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth Goldberg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth Goldberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth Goldberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beth Goldberg. Beth Goldberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Maertens, Rakoen, Jon Roozenbeek, Jon S. Simons, et al.. (2025). Psychological booster shots targeting memory increase long-term resistance against misinformation. Nature Communications. 16(1). 2062–2062. 10 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Kelley, Patrick Gage, et al.. (2025). Beyond Digital Literacy: Building Youth Digital Resilience Through Existing “Information Sensibility” Practices. Social Sciences. 14(4). 230–230. 1 indexed citations
3.
Roozenbeek, Jon, Jana Lasser, Melanie Marks, et al.. (2025). Misinformation interventions and online sharing behaviour: lessons learned from two pre-registered field studies. Royal Society Open Science. 12(11). 251377–251377.
4.
Le, Nhu D., et al.. (2025). “Information Modes”. 3(1).
5.
Roozenbeek, Jon, Jana Lasser, Melanie Marks, et al.. (2025). Misinformation interventions and online sharing behavior: Lessons learned from two preregistered field studies. PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
6.
Goldberg, Beth, et al.. (2024). Sowing “seeds of doubt”: Cottage industries of election and medical misinformation in Brazil and the United States. New Media & Society. 27(10). 5710–5735. 1 indexed citations
7.
Pennycook, Gordon, Adam J. Berinsky, Puneet Bhargava, et al.. (2024). Inoculation and accuracy prompting increase accuracy discernment in combination but not alone. Nature Human Behaviour. 8(12). 2330–2341. 7 indexed citations
8.
Consolvo, Sunny, et al.. (2023). Practicing Information Sensibility: How Gen Z Engages with Online Information. 1–17. 29 indexed citations
9.
Lupu, Yonatan, Richard Sear, Nicolás Velásquez, et al.. (2023). Offline events and online hate. PLoS ONE. 18(1). e0278511–e0278511. 25 indexed citations
10.
Roozenbeek, Jon, Sander van der Linden, Beth Goldberg, Steve Rathje, & Stephan Lewandowsky. (2022). Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media. Science Advances. 8(34). eabo6254–eabo6254. 181 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Piltch‐Loeb, Rachael, Brian Hughes, Marcia A. Testa, et al.. (2022). Testing the Efficacy of Attitudinal Inoculation Videos to Enhance COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: Quasi-Experimental Intervention Trial. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 8(6). e34615–e34615. 21 indexed citations
12.
Braddock, Kurt, Brian Hughes, Beth Goldberg, & Cynthia Miller‐Idriss. (2022). Engagement in subversive online activity predicts susceptibility to persuasion by far-right extremist propaganda. New Media & Society. 26(4). 1775–1798. 6 indexed citations
13.
Velásquez, Nicolás, Rhys Leahy, Nicholas J. Restrepo, et al.. (2021). Online hate network spreads malicious COVID-19 content outside the control of individual social media platforms. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 11549–11549. 44 indexed citations
14.
Goldberg, Beth, et al.. (2021). A large-scale characterization of online incitements to harassment across platforms. 621–638. 5 indexed citations
15.
Piltch‐Loeb, Rachael, Elena Savoia, Beth Goldberg, et al.. (2021). Examining the effect of information channel on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. PLoS ONE. 16(5). e0251095–e0251095. 146 indexed citations
16.
Hughes, Brian, et al.. (2021). Development of a Codebook of Online Anti-Vaccination Rhetoric to Manage COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(14). 7556–7556. 51 indexed citations
17.
Savoia, Elena, Rachael Piltch‐Loeb, Beth Goldberg, et al.. (2021). Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Socio-Demographics, Co-Morbidity, and Past Experience of Racial Discrimination. Vaccines. 9(7). 767–767. 131 indexed citations
18.
Goldberg, Beth. (2005). Art of the Narrative: Interpreting Visual Stories. Art Education. 58(2). 25–32. 4 indexed citations
19.
Goldberg, Beth. (1993). Translating data into practice.. PubMed. 35(1). 45–7. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026