Beth Goldberg
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Health top 2%
- Communication top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Infectious Diseases
- Co-authors
- Cynthia Miller‐IdrissBrian HughesRachael Piltch‐LoebElena SavoiaStephan LewandowskyJon RoozenbeekSander van der LindenMarcia A. Testa
- Topics
- Misinformation and Its Impacts (12 papers)Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (8 papers)Social Media and Politics (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Beth Goldberg
16 papers receiving 648 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Sociology and Political Science 456
- Health 319
- Communication 128
- Artificial Intelligence 122
- Infectious Diseases 108
Countries citing papers authored by Beth Goldberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Goldberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Goldberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Goldberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Goldberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Goldberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Goldberg. The network helps show where Beth Goldberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth Goldberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth Goldberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth Goldberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beth Goldberg. Beth Goldberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Psychological booster shots targeting memory increase long-term resistance against misinformationbreakdown → | 10 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social mediabreakdown → | 181 |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 146 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 131 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | Translating data into practice. | 1 |
About Beth Goldberg
Beth Goldberg is a scholar working on Communication, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (12 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (8 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (319 citations), Communication (128 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (74 citations). Beth Goldberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Cynthia Miller‐Idriss, Brian Hughes, Rachael Piltch‐Loeb, Elena Savoia, Stephan Lewandowsky, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander van der Linden, Marcia A. Testa, Steve Rathje and Nicolás Velásquez. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.