Beth Ann Cureton
About
In The Last Decade
Beth Ann Cureton
7 papers receiving 525 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Surgery 524
- Epidemiology 314
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 107
- Emergency Medicine 101
- Rehabilitation 50
Countries citing papers authored by Beth Ann Cureton
This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Ann Cureton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Ann Cureton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Ann Cureton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Ann Cureton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Ann Cureton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Ann Cureton. The network helps show where Beth Ann Cureton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth Ann Cureton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth Ann Cureton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth Ann Cureton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beth Ann Cureton. Beth Ann Cureton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 235 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 85 | |
| 7 | 124 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.