Bernardo C. Mendes

3.1k total citations
174 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Bernardo C. Mendes is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Bernardo C. Mendes has authored 174 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 156 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 89 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 62 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Bernardo C. Mendes's work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (139 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (93 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (78 papers). Bernardo C. Mendes is often cited by papers focused on Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (139 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (93 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (78 papers). Bernardo C. Mendes collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Netherlands. Bernardo C. Mendes's co-authors include Gustavo S. Oderich, Emanuel R. Tenorio, Gustavo S. Oderich, Randall R. DeMartino, Thanila A. Macedo, Jussi M. Kärkkäinen, Péter Gloviczki, Thomas C. Bower, Guilherme Baumgardt Barbosa Lima and Giulianna B. Marcondes and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Annals of Surgery and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Bernardo C. Mendes

146 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Bernardo C. Mendes
L.C. Brown United Kingdom
Shuab Omer United States
Jon Suh South Korea
Emanuel R. Tenorio United States
G. Menyhei Hungary
L.C. Brown United Kingdom
Bernardo C. Mendes
Citations per year, relative to Bernardo C. Mendes Bernardo C. Mendes (= 1×) peers L.C. Brown

Countries citing papers authored by Bernardo C. Mendes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bernardo C. Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernardo C. Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernardo C. Mendes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bernardo C. Mendes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernardo C. Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernardo C. Mendes. The network helps show where Bernardo C. Mendes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bernardo C. Mendes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bernardo C. Mendes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bernardo C. Mendes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bernardo C. Mendes. Bernardo C. Mendes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Vacirca, Andrea, Aidin Baghbani‐Oskouei, Emanuel R. Tenorio, et al.. (2024). Aneurysm sac shrinkage at 1 year after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of complex aortic aneurysms offers mid-term survival advantage. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 80(4). 958–967.e3. 1 indexed citations
4.
Shuja, Fahad, Jill J. Colglazier, Manju Kalra, et al.. (2024). Comparative Outcomes of Arterial Bypass Using the Human Acellular Vessel and Great Saphenous Vein in Patients With Chronic Limb Ischemia. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 79(6). e80–e81. 1 indexed citations
5.
Gallitto, Enrico, Gianluca Faggioli, Andrea Vacirca, et al.. (2024). Editor's Choice – Hybrid Stent Graft Technique in Bridging Hostile Renal Arteries in Thoraco-abdominal Branched Endografting. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 69(3). 422–431. 4 indexed citations
7.
Mendes, Bernardo C., Todd E. Rasmussen, Fahad Shuja, et al.. (2024). Implications and late outcomes of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 80(3). 702–713.e3. 5 indexed citations
8.
Lima, Guilherme Baumgardt Barbosa, et al.. (2024). Current state of endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Vessel Plus. 8. 10–10. 2 indexed citations
9.
Agasthi, Pradyumna, Bernardo C. Mendes, Allison K. Cabalka, et al.. (2024). Thoracic Branching Endoprosthesis for Management of Coarctation of the Aorta With Subclavian Artery Involvement. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. 3(4). 101335–101335. 1 indexed citations
10.
DeMartino, Randall R., Bernardo C. Mendes, Jill J. Colglazier, et al.. (2024). Mortality Following Intervention for Acute Arterial Mesenteric Ischemia Remains Unchanged In Spite of Escalating Use of Endovascular Revascularization. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 79(6). e122–e123. 1 indexed citations
11.
Davila, Victor J., et al.. (2023). Intraoperative workload in elective open vascular and endovascular surgery: A study of procedural drivers. Applied Ergonomics. 111. 104049–104049. 1 indexed citations
12.
Vacirca, Andrea, Aidin Baghbani‐Oskouei, Ying Huang, et al.. (2023). Total Transfemoral Approach Is Associated With Lower Rates of Cerebrovascular Events and Improved Outcomes Compared With Upper Extremity Approach During Fenestrated-Branch Endovascular Aortic Repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 77(6). e92–e93. 2 indexed citations
13.
Chait, Jesse, Bernardo C. Mendes, Lily E. Johnston, et al.. (2023). Hybrid repair strategies for acute type B aortic dissection complicating prior standard and complex endovascular aortic repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques. 9(2). 101200–101200.
14.
Novák, Zdeněk, Matthew J. Eagleton, Mark A. Farber, et al.. (2023). Predictors and outcomes of spinal cord injury following complex branched/fenestrated endovascular aortic repair in the US Aortic Research Consortium. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 77(6). 1578–1587. 18 indexed citations
15.
Colglazier, Jill J., Fahad Shuja, Manju Kalra, et al.. (2023). Cryopreserved arterial allografts vs autologous vein for arterial reconstruction in infected fields. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 79(4). 941–947. 1 indexed citations
16.
Glasgow, Amy E., Jill J. Colglazier, Manju Kalra, et al.. (2023). Cryopreserved arterial allografts vs rifampin-soaked Dacron for the treatment of infected aortic and iliac grafts. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 78(4). 1064–1073.e1. 4 indexed citations
17.
Macedo, Thanila A., Gina K. Hesley, Tiziano Tallarita, et al.. (2023). Changes in renal-mesenteric duplex ultrasound velocities after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 78(5). 1162–1169.e2.
18.
Tenorio, Emanuel R., Jesse Chait, Robert A. Vierkant, et al.. (2023). Preoperative predictors of nonhome discharge after fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 79(3). 469–477.e3. 1 indexed citations
19.
DeMartino, Randall R., et al.. (2022). Liposuction to improve vascular access in hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistulas. Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques. 8(4). 719–725. 1 indexed citations
20.
Lima, Guilherme Baumgardt Barbosa, Emanuel R. Tenorio, Giulianna B. Marcondes, et al.. (2021). Outcomes of Balloon-expandable Versus Self-expandable Stent Grafts for Endovascular Repair of Iliac Aneurysms Using Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 74(3). e224–e225. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026