Benjamin Smith

10.9k total citations
49 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Benjamin Smith is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research and Dermatology. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Smith has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 12 papers in Cancer Research and 11 papers in Dermatology. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Smith's work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (12 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (11 papers) and Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (11 papers). Benjamin Smith is often cited by papers focused on Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (12 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (11 papers) and Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (11 papers). Benjamin Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Singapore. Benjamin Smith's co-authors include Gary M. Williams, B. Safford, C. McNamara, Jean‐Charles Leblanc, Tetyana Kobets, Graham Ellis, A.M. Api, Michael Dinovi, Myriam Coulet and S. Tozer and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Nutrients.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Smith

47 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin Smith United States 19 273 232 213 186 166 49 1.0k
Raja S. Settivari United States 18 258 0.9× 267 1.2× 59 0.3× 67 0.4× 142 0.9× 38 1.1k
Hans Gfeller Switzerland 16 93 0.3× 192 0.8× 299 1.4× 63 0.3× 11 0.1× 24 828
Alenka Levart Slovenia 20 64 0.2× 255 1.1× 40 0.2× 132 0.7× 62 0.4× 63 1.1k
Daland R. Juberg United States 17 371 1.4× 224 1.0× 20 0.1× 39 0.2× 101 0.6× 37 852
Shenggan Wu China 18 514 1.9× 306 1.3× 88 0.4× 160 0.9× 14 0.1× 53 1.3k
Annette Petersen Denmark 19 363 1.3× 363 1.6× 9 0.0× 284 1.5× 66 0.4× 35 953
Thomas N. Asquith United States 11 137 0.5× 172 0.7× 10 0.0× 144 0.8× 43 0.3× 15 930
Wannee Jiraungkoorskul Thailand 18 446 1.6× 328 1.4× 4 0.0× 111 0.6× 41 0.2× 83 1.3k
Janet A. Springer United States 14 165 0.6× 197 0.8× 4 0.0× 92 0.5× 172 1.0× 41 774
F. E. Guthrie United States 18 234 0.9× 553 2.4× 44 0.2× 95 0.5× 103 0.6× 92 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Smith. The network helps show where Benjamin Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Smith. Benjamin Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
3.
Gautam, Archana, et al.. (2024). Assessing nanotoxicity of food-relevant particles: A comparative analysis of cellular responses in cell monolayers versus 3D gut epithelial cultures. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 193. 115055–115055. 2 indexed citations
4.
Kobets, Tetyana, Christina Hickey, George E. Johnson, et al.. (2023). Assessment of no-observed-effect-levels for DNA adducts formation by genotoxic carcinogens in fetal turkey livers. Toxicology. 501. 153714–153714.
5.
O’Brien, John, et al.. (2023). Consumer habits and practices for cosmetics and personal care products in Singapore: An online survey. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 174. 113659–113659. 3 indexed citations
6.
Anastasiou, Kim, et al.. (2023). Nutrient composition of milk and plant-based milk alternatives: A cross-sectional study of products sold in Australia and Singapore. Food Research International. 173(Pt 2). 113475–113475. 15 indexed citations
7.
8.
Smith, Benjamin, et al.. (2022). An updated review of published human health risk-benefit assessment studies in the scientific literature. 6(1). 62–67. 1 indexed citations
9.
Cleanthous, Xenia, et al.. (2021). Assessment of artificial and natural sweeteners present in packaged non-alcoholic beverages (NABs) sold on the Singapore market. BMC Public Health. 21(1). 1866–1866. 6 indexed citations
10.
Moustakas, H., A.M. Api, Benjamin Smith, et al.. (2021). Assessment of the genotoxic potential of mintlactone. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 159. 112659–112659. 1 indexed citations
11.
Api, A.M., David Basketter, James Winfred Bridges, et al.. (2020). Updating exposure assessment for skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment for fragrance materials. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 118. 104805–104805. 52 indexed citations
12.
Kobets, Tetyana, Jian‐Dong Duan, Klaus D. Brunnemann, et al.. (2018). In ovo testing of flavor and fragrance materials in Turkey Egg Genotoxicity Assay (TEGA), comparison of results to in vitro and in vivo data. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 115. 228–243. 14 indexed citations
13.
Bastaki, Maria, Thierry Cachet, Jan Demyttenaere, et al.. (2018). Absence of adverse effects following the gavage administration of methyl propyl trisulfide to Sprague-Dawley rats for 90 days. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 120. 544–551. 3 indexed citations
14.
Macmillan, Donna S., Thomas Steger‐Hartmann, Jedd Hillegass, et al.. (2018). Making reliable negative predictions of human skin sensitisation using an in silico fragmentation approach. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 95. 227–235. 19 indexed citations
15.
Bastaki, Maria, Mark R. Bauter, Thierry Cachet, et al.. (2018). Absence of adverse effects following administration of piperine in the diet of Sprague-Dawley rats for 90 days. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 120. 213–221. 18 indexed citations
16.
Bastaki, Maria, Mark R. Bauter, Thierry Cachet, et al.. (2018). Absence of renal adverse effects from β-myrcene dietary administration in OECD guideline-compliant subchronic toxicity study. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 120. 222–229. 6 indexed citations
17.
Api, A.M., C. B. Barrett, Graham Ellis, et al.. (2017). Integrating habits and practices data for soaps, cosmetics and air care products into an existing aggregate exposure model. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 88. 144–156. 34 indexed citations
18.
Benford, D., P. Michael Bolger, Myriam Coulet, et al.. (2010). Special Issue: Application of the Margin of Exposure (MoE) Approach to Substances in Food that are Genotoxic and Carcinogenic.. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 48. 11 indexed citations
19.
Nordmann, H., Bernard Bottex, B. Safford, et al.. (2010). Use of retailer fidelity card schemes in the assessment of food additive intake: Sunset Yellow a case study. Food Additives & Contaminants Part A. 27(11). 1507–1515. 20 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Craig, et al.. (2006). Mosquito repellents in frog skin. Biology Letters. 2(2). 242–245. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Raja S. Settivari Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hans Gfeller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alenka Levart Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daland R. Juberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shenggan Wu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annette Petersen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas N. Asquith Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wannee Jiraungkoorskul Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janet A. Springer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by F. E. Guthrie
Rankless by CCL
2026