Benjamin E. Schaffer

412 citations
6 papers · 312 · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin E. Schaffer

6 papers receiving 311 citations

Hit Papers

Tree carbon allocation explains forest drought‐kill and recovery patterns 2018 · 252 citations
2520+2+5Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Benjamin E. Schaffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 150
  • Global and Planetary Change 258
  • Atmospheric Science 158
  • Earth-Surface Processes 15
  • Ecology 42
Replace Martin Hertel with:
Martin Hertel Germany
Jan Král Czechia
Elizabeth Stockton United States
Dejan Firm Slovenia
Bernhard E. Splechtna Canada
Stella Bogino Argentina
Monika Frehner Switzerland
Toshihiro Umebayashi Japan
Fedör Tatarinov Israel
Matthew Brookhouse Australia
Benjamin E. Schaffer relative to Martin Hertel Germany Martin Hertel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Martin Hertel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin E. Schaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin E. Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin E. Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin E. Schaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin E. Schaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin E. Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin E. Schaffer. The network helps show where Benjamin E. Schaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin E. Schaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin E. Schaffer Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin E. Schaffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
Tree carbon allocation explains forest drought‐kill and recovery patterns
Hit paper breakdown →
2018252
2 201724
3 202014
4 201514
5 20236
6 20182

About Benjamin E. Schaffer

Benjamin E. Schaffer is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Ecology and Epidemiology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (3 papers), Coastal and Marine Dynamics (1 paper), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (1 paper), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper), Influenza Virus Research Studies (1 paper) and Aeolian processes and effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (150 citations), Global and Planetary Change (258 citations), Atmospheric Science (158 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (15 citations) and Ecology (42 citations). Benjamin E. Schaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and China. Frequent co-authors include Christopher R. Schwalm, David Medvigy, William R. L. Anderegg, Anna T. Trugman, Megan K. Bartlett, Stephen W. Pacala, Matteo Detto, I. Rodriguez‐Iturbe, Xin‐ping Wang and Zhenlei Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences and Ecology Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact