Benjamin Doolittle

1.1k total citations
65 papers, 736 citations indexed

About

Benjamin Doolittle is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Doolittle has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 736 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in General Health Professions, 28 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 16 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Doolittle's work include Innovations in Medical Education (18 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (17 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (15 papers). Benjamin Doolittle is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (18 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (17 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (15 papers). Benjamin Doolittle collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ghana and Brazil. Benjamin Doolittle's co-authors include Donna M. Windish, Charles B. Seelig, Amy C. Justice, David A. Fiellin, William C. Becker, Marta Illueca, Matthew S. Ellman, José Costa, Janet Rettig Emanuel and Stephen R. Holt and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The American Journal of Medicine and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Doolittle

53 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin Doolittle United States 15 355 221 196 194 123 65 736
Philip M. Alberti United States 16 397 1.1× 160 0.7× 116 0.6× 177 0.9× 143 1.2× 34 859
Mojgan Padyab Sweden 17 265 0.7× 129 0.6× 121 0.6× 223 1.1× 97 0.8× 71 825
Anna Gkiouleka United Kingdom 11 289 0.8× 144 0.7× 69 0.4× 151 0.8× 54 0.4× 21 537
In Han Song South Korea 13 243 0.7× 135 0.6× 141 0.7× 153 0.8× 71 0.6× 69 635
Raquel Buranosky United States 14 342 1.0× 462 2.1× 192 1.0× 226 1.2× 92 0.7× 28 846
Ameneh Setareh Forouzan Iran 15 317 0.9× 158 0.7× 105 0.5× 224 1.2× 124 1.0× 67 754
Kristy K. Martyn United States 17 496 1.4× 110 0.5× 133 0.7× 164 0.8× 49 0.4× 60 930
Anusha M. Vable United States 15 309 0.9× 227 1.0× 78 0.4× 133 0.7× 46 0.4× 38 706
Marta Maria Alves da Silva Brazil 15 346 1.0× 178 0.8× 213 1.1× 94 0.5× 132 1.1× 25 924
Shawn M. Kneipp United States 19 455 1.3× 114 0.5× 173 0.9× 115 0.6× 58 0.5× 64 971

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Doolittle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Doolittle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Doolittle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Doolittle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Doolittle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Doolittle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Doolittle. The network helps show where Benjamin Doolittle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Doolittle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Doolittle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Doolittle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Doolittle. Benjamin Doolittle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Doolittle, Benjamin & Andrew J. Loza. (2025). Fractal Geometry and the Complexity of Medical Decision‐Making. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 31(3). e70086–e70086.
3.
Doolittle, Benjamin, et al.. (2024). Advancing the Effectiveness of Holistic Care in the United States: Integrating Religion and Spirituality. Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. 31(1). 100–104.
4.
Brown, Bryan T., et al.. (2023). Medical Educator as Game Master: What Dungeons & Dragons Can Teach Us About Small Group Learning. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 15(4). 428–431.
5.
Doolittle, Benjamin, et al.. (2023). Fostering Eudaimonia, Joy, and Connection among Resident Physicians: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science. 8(10). 443–445.
6.
Meints, Samantha M., et al.. (2023). The Pain and PRAYER Scale (PPRAYERS): development and validation of a scale to measure pain-related prayer. Pain Medicine. 24(7). 862–871.
7.
Doolittle, Benjamin, et al.. (2022). What Educators Can Learn from the Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model of Patient Care: Time for Holistic Medical Education. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 37(8). 2062–2066. 8 indexed citations
8.
Loza, Andrew J., et al.. (2022). Rates of Body Mass Index Increase in Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Childhood Obesity. 19(5). 353–356. 1 indexed citations
9.
Loza, Andrew J., et al.. (2022). Collateral Damage from the COVID-19 Pandemic: Pediatric Obesity. Population Health Management. 25(4). 573–574. 3 indexed citations
10.
Doolittle, Benjamin. (2021). Are we Athens or Florence? COVID-19 in historical context. Family Medicine and Community Health. 9(1). e000811–e000811. 2 indexed citations
11.
Doolittle, Benjamin, et al.. (2021). Thriving among Primary Care Physicians: a Qualitative Study. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 36(12). 3759–3765. 18 indexed citations
12.
Koenig, Harold G., Jill B. Hamilton, & Benjamin Doolittle. (2021). Training to Conduct Research on Religion, Spirituality and Health: A Commentary. Journal of Religion and Health. 60(3). 2178–2189. 8 indexed citations
13.
Holt, Stephen R., et al.. (2020). Creating a Satisfying Continuity Clinic Experience for Primary Care Trainees. The American Journal of Medicine. 134(4). 547–553. 1 indexed citations
14.
Doolittle, Benjamin, Kathleen A. McGinnis, Yusuf Ransome, David A. Fiellin, & Amy C. Justice. (2020). Mortality, Health, and Substance Abuse by Religious Attendance Among HIV Infected Patients from the Veterans Aging Cohort Study. AIDS and Behavior. 25(3). 653–660. 7 indexed citations
15.
Doolittle, Benjamin, Jonathan Lim, & Laura Edgar. (2020). Milestones 2.0 – A Growth Mindset for Internal Medicine Residency Programs. The American Journal of Medicine. 133(12). 1492–1499. 9 indexed citations
16.
Rosenblum, Hannah, et al.. (2019). A resident-led project to improve documentation of overweight and obesity in a primary care clinic. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives. 9(5). 377–383. 4 indexed citations
17.
Holt, Stephen R., et al.. (2019). Physicians Should Play a Role in Ensuring Safe Firearm Ownership. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34(8). 1637–1640. 1 indexed citations
18.
Holt, Stephen R., et al.. (2018). Factors Affecting Resident Satisfaction in Continuity Clinic—a Systematic Review. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 33(8). 1386–1393. 23 indexed citations
19.
Doolittle, Benjamin, Amy C. Justice, & David A. Fiellin. (2016). Religion, Spirituality, and HIV Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review of the Literature. AIDS and Behavior. 22(6). 1792–1801. 41 indexed citations
20.
Doolittle, Benjamin. (2007). Burnout and coping among parish-based clergy. Mental Health Religion & Culture. 10(1). 31–38. 77 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026