Benjamin Doolittle

53 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers

Benjamin Doolittle
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Health 221
  • Research and Theory 14
  • General Health Professions 355
  • Clinical Psychology 194
  • Family Practice 19
Replace Martha Meraviglia with:
Martha Meraviglia United States
Inaam Khalaf Jordan
Dula F. Pacquiao United States
Arwa Oweis Jordan
Carol Shieh United States
Kazuhiro Nakayama Japan
Chin‐Yen Han Taiwan
Anne Derouin United States
Anne Lise Holm Norway
Benjamin Doolittle relative to Martha Meraviglia United States Martha Meraviglia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Martha Meraviglia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Doolittle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Doolittle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Doolittle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Doolittle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Doolittle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Doolittle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Doolittle. The network helps show where Benjamin Doolittle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Doolittle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Doolittle Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Doolittle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201380
2 200777
3 200863
4 200453
5 201747
6 201641
7 202041
8 201539
9 201124
10 201823
11 200122
12 202321
13 202020
14 202118
15 201915
16 202211
17 201610
18 20209
19 20228
20 20218

About Benjamin Doolittle

Benjamin Doolittle is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 65 papers that have together received 736 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (18 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (17 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (15 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (221 citations), Research and Theory (14 citations), General Health Professions (355 citations), Clinical Psychology (194 citations) and Family Practice (19 citations). Benjamin Doolittle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ghana and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Donna M. Windish, Charles B. Seelig, David A. Fiellin, Amy C. Justice, William C. Becker, Marta Illueca, Matthew S. Ellman, Janet Rettig Emanuel, José Costa and Stephen R. Holt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of Religion and Health, Family Medicine and Community Health, AIDS and Behavior and The American Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact