Benjamin C. Jantzen
- Molecular Biology
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Genetics
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Thomas EisnerMichelle D. WangSteven J. KochAlla ShundrovskyNicole AbaidDavid DanksBryan MesmerDeborah G. Mayo
- Topics
- Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers)Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (4 papers)Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesBiophysical JournalChaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Benjamin C. Jantzen
19 papers receiving 272 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Molecular Biology 85
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 66
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 64
- Genetics 48
- History and Philosophy of Science 37
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin C. Jantzen
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin C. Jantzen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin C. Jantzen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin C. Jantzen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin C. Jantzen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin C. Jantzen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin C. Jantzen. The network helps show where Benjamin C. Jantzen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin C. Jantzen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin C. Jantzen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin C. Jantzen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin C. Jantzen. Benjamin C. Jantzen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | How Symmetry Undid the Particle: A Demonstration of the Incompatibility of Particle Interpretations and Permutation Invariance | 1 |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 101 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 106 |
About Benjamin C. Jantzen
Benjamin C. Jantzen is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Signal Processing and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (4 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations), Structural Biology (7 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations). Benjamin C. Jantzen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Eisner, Michelle D. Wang, Steven J. Koch, Alla Shundrovsky, Nicole Abaid, David Danks, Bryan Mesmer and Deborah G. Mayo. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biophysical Journal and Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.