Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Non-aqueous electrolytes for sodium-ion batteries
2014610 citationsAlexandre Ponrouch, Damien Monti et al.Journal of Materials Chemistry Aprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Bengt Steen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bengt Steen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bengt Steen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bengt Steen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bengt Steen. The network helps show where Bengt Steen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bengt Steen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bengt Steen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bengt Steen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bengt Steen. Bengt Steen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cinelli, Marco, Cecilia Askham, Andrea Amadei, et al.. (2022). Criteria Used to Review Weighting Methods As Part of the UN Environment Life Cycle Initiative's Global Guidance on Environmental Life Cycle Impact Assessment Indicators (GLAM) Project. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).1 indexed citations
Ponrouch, Alexandre, Damien Monti, Andrea Boschin, et al.. (2014). Non-aqueous electrolytes for sodium-ion batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 3(1). 22–42.610 indexed citations breakdown →
Steen, Bengt, et al.. (2005). A Statistical Approach for Estimation of Process Flow Data from Production of Chemicals of Fossil Origin. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).6 indexed citations
Steen, Bengt. (1999). A Systematic Approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in Product Development (EPS) Version 2000-General System Characteristics. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).168 indexed citations
11.
Steen, Bengt. (1999). A Systematic Approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in Product Development (EPS) Version 2000- Models and data of the default method. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).141 indexed citations
12.
Tillman, Anne‐Marie, et al.. (1998). Lci data modelling and a database design. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 3(2). 106–113.16 indexed citations
13.
Steen, Bengt, et al.. (1996). Building with straw bales. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 371(153). 433–40.8 indexed citations
Steen, Bengt, et al.. (1992). The EPS enviro-accounting method. An application of environmental accounting principles for evaluation and valuation of environmental impact in product design.. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).57 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.