Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore

17 total papers · 530 total citations
9 papers, 123 citations indexed

About

Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Geriatrics and Gerontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 123 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 2 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology. Recurrent topics in Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore's work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore is often cited by papers focused on Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore collaborates with scholars based in France, Thailand and India. Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore's co-authors include Anne‐Marie Schott, Isabelle Amigues, Florence Canouï‐Poitrine, Éléna Paillaud, Mohamed Amine, Marc Bonnefoy, Olivier Beauchet, Yves Rolland, Jean David and Pierre‐Yves Gueugniaud and has published in prestigious journals such as Hepatology, Human Pathology and American Journal of Hematology.

In The Last Decade

Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore

9 papers receiving 118 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore 30 28 27 21 21 9 123
Uma Sankar 33 1.1× 42 1.5× 21 0.8× 6 0.3× 16 0.8× 12 258
G. James Morgan 20 0.7× 21 0.8× 23 0.9× 12 0.6× 41 2.0× 10 222
Malgorzata Magliano 23 0.8× 48 1.7× 34 1.3× 33 1.6× 33 1.6× 10 219
Antonio Bianchessi 62 2.1× 25 0.9× 13 0.5× 15 0.7× 8 0.4× 7 165
Catherine Moltzan 27 0.9× 31 1.1× 27 1.0× 9 0.4× 9 0.4× 10 215
S Manfreda 6 0.2× 31 1.1× 21 0.8× 3 0.1× 15 0.7× 6 232
Cristina Encinas 19 0.6× 29 1.0× 5 0.2× 7 0.3× 5 0.2× 11 214
Joan Von Feldt 26 0.9× 23 0.8× 7 0.3× 23 1.1× 6 0.3× 9 224
Cécile Poupardin 22 0.7× 8 0.3× 77 2.9× 35 1.7× 16 0.8× 12 242
Stéphane Darre 28 0.9× 65 2.3× 4 0.1× 37 1.8× 17 0.8× 8 244

Countries citing papers authored by Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore. The network helps show where Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore. Bénédicte Gelas‐Dore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026