Benedict Hayhoe

66 papers receiving 973 citations

Peers

Benedict Hayhoe
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 187
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 125
  • Health Informatics 40
  • Family Practice 44
  • General Health Professions 383
Replace Andrea M. Wessell with:
Andrea M. Wessell United States
Kelly Carroll Canada
Lama Nazer Jordan
Amol A. Verma Canada
Natasha Parekh United States
Ruslana Tsurikova United States
Kirsten Galbraith Australia
Cara B. Litvin United States
Lisha Lo Canada
Azita G. Hamedani United States
Benedict Hayhoe relative to Andrea M. Wessell United States Andrea M. Wessell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Andrea M. Wessell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benedict Hayhoe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benedict Hayhoe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benedict Hayhoe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benedict Hayhoe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benedict Hayhoe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benedict Hayhoe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benedict Hayhoe. The network helps show where Benedict Hayhoe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benedict Hayhoe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benedict Hayhoe Line = papers co-authored together Benedict Hayhoe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20251
3 20250
4 20250
5 20241
6 20247
7 20241
8 202320
9 20237
10 20230
11 20235
12 20236
13 20222
14 20221
15 20224
16 202110
17 202118
18 20206
19
Do variations in primary care practice characteristics explain the effect of a financial incentive scheme on antibiotic prescribing? A longitudinal study of the Quality Premium intervention in NHS England.
20201
20 20203

About Benedict Hayhoe

Benedict Hayhoe is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Family Practice, Health Informatics, Geriatrics and Gerontology and General Health Professions, having authored 81 papers that have together received 991 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (20 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (16 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (14 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (10 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (9 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (9 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (187 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (125 citations), Health Informatics (40 citations), Family Practice (44 citations) and General Health Professions (383 citations). Benedict Hayhoe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Azeem Majeed, Geva Greenfield, Paul Aylin, Alex Bottle, Martín Cowie, Dani Kim, Alison Holmes, Pau Herrero, Luke Moore and Esmita Charani. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, BMJ Open, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Journal of Medical Internet Research and BJGP Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026