Benacerraf Br
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Surgery
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Urology top 10%
- Topics
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers)Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (3 papers)Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Benacerraf Br
10 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 145
- Surgery 117
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 78
- Reproductive Medicine 63
- Urology 54
Countries citing papers authored by Benacerraf Br
This map shows the geographic impact of Benacerraf Br's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benacerraf Br with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benacerraf Br more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benacerraf Br
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benacerraf Br. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benacerraf Br. The network helps show where Benacerraf Br may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benacerraf Br
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benacerraf Br. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benacerraf Br based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benacerraf Br. Benacerraf Br is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Abnormal karyotype of fetuses with omphalocele: prediction based on omphalocele contents. | 52 |
| 3 | Sonographic accuracy in the diagnosis of ovarian masses. | 68 |
| 4 | Echogenic fetal bowel in the third trimester associated with meconium ileus secondary to cystic fibrosis. A case report. | 8 |
| 5 | The use of sonography for the antenatal detection of aneuploidy. | 3 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Sonographic detection of fetal hydrops. A report of two cases. | 5 |
| 8 | Ultrasonographic determination of chorion type in twin gestation. | 63 |
| 9 | Second trimester oligohydramnios, a predictor of poor fetal outcome. | 59 |
| 10 | Amniocentesis under continuous ultrasound guidance: a series of 232 cases. | 15 |
About Benacerraf Br
Benacerraf Br is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (3 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (78 citations), Urology (54 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (63 citations). Benacerraf Br has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Frigoletto Fd, Claudia Wojciechowski, Rebecca Gelman, Mark Phillippe and Bryann Bromley. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.