Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beck. The network helps show where Beck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Beck. Beck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
William, William, et al.. (2016). The Development and Validation of a Measure of Career Integration in College Students. 6(6). 371–376.1 indexed citations
2.
Beck, et al.. (2016). La consommation de tabac au cours des années lycée. Résultats de l'enquête ESPAD 2015..2 indexed citations
3.
Richard & Beck. (2016). Tendances de long terme des consommations de tabac et d'alcool en France, au prisme du genre et des inégalités sociales..7 indexed citations
4.
Patrick, Patrick, et al.. (2015). Gastrointestinal dysbiosis and the use of fecal microbial transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection. 169–180.
5.
Richárd, et al.. (2013). Les accidents en France : évolution et facteurs associés.. Revue d Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique.4 indexed citations
6.
Beck, et al.. (2013). Nexus security： governance, innovation and the resilient city. 640–657.1 indexed citations
7.
Beck, et al.. (2013). On water security, sustainability, and the water-food-energy-climate nexus. 626–639.6 indexed citations
8.
Richárd, et al.. (2013). La consommation d'alcool des 18-25 ans en 2010 en France : spécificités et évolutions depuis 2005..2 indexed citations
9.
Beck, et al.. (2012). La chute du temps de sommeil au cours de l'adolescence : résultats de l'enquête HBSC 2010 menée auprès des collégiens..2 indexed citations
10.
Fischer, �., et al.. (2009). InP based terahertz quantum cascade lasers with 4 quantum well active region design. Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference. 1–2.1 indexed citations
11.
Beck, et al.. (2007). Hepatitis B virus replication. 世界胃肠病学杂志：英文版（电子版）. 13(1). 48–64.3 indexed citations
12.
Beck, et al.. (2007). Volatile organic compounds in dwelling houses and stables of dairy and cattle farms in Northern Germany.. The Science of The Total Environment.10 indexed citations
13.
Beck, et al.. (2006). Hematopoietic cell transplantation for Crohn＇s disease; is it time？. 世界胃肠病学杂志：英文版（电子版）. 12(41). 6665–6673.19 indexed citations
Beck. (1986). Likelihood ratios. Another enhancement of sensitivity and specificity.. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 110(8). 685–686.51 indexed citations
Beck, et al.. (1964). BAT RABIES. A DISCUSSION OF PROBLEMS EXISTING IN OHIO.. PubMed. 60. 361–4.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.