Beatriz Fonseca
About
In The Last Decade
Beatriz Fonseca
11 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Plant Science 181
- Molecular Biology 159
- Infectious Diseases 81
- Epidemiology 61
- Food Science 57
Countries citing papers authored by Beatriz Fonseca
This map shows the geographic impact of Beatriz Fonseca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beatriz Fonseca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beatriz Fonseca more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beatriz Fonseca
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beatriz Fonseca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beatriz Fonseca. The network helps show where Beatriz Fonseca may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beatriz Fonseca
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beatriz Fonseca. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beatriz Fonseca based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beatriz Fonseca. Beatriz Fonseca is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 197 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.