Batsheva Marcos
About
In The Last Decade
Batsheva Marcos
6 papers receiving 180 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Pharmacology 141
- Rheumatology 80
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 54
- Dermatology 46
- Infectious Diseases 31
Countries citing papers authored by Batsheva Marcos
This map shows the geographic impact of Batsheva Marcos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Batsheva Marcos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Batsheva Marcos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Batsheva Marcos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Batsheva Marcos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Batsheva Marcos. The network helps show where Batsheva Marcos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Batsheva Marcos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Batsheva Marcos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Batsheva Marcos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Batsheva Marcos. Batsheva Marcos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 45 | |
| 3 | 118 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Widespread pruritic papulopustules after returning from Thailand. | 1 |
| 6 | 4 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.