Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
2016 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in Collaboration With EACTS
20161.5k citationsPaulus Kirchhof, Stefano Benussi et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Bart Van de Putte
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bart Van de Putte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bart Van de Putte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bart Van de Putte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bart Van de Putte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bart Van de Putte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bart Van de Putte. The network helps show where Bart Van de Putte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bart Van de Putte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bart Van de Putte.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bart Van de Putte based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bart Van de Putte. Bart Van de Putte is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vercruyssen, Anina, Bart Van de Putte, & Ineke Stoop. (2011). Are they really too busy for survey participation? The evolution of busyness and busyness claims in Flanders. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).9 indexed citations
Matthijs, Koen, Bart Van de Putte, Jan Kok, & Hilde Bras. (2010). Leven in de lage landen: historisch-demografisch onderzoek in Vlaanderen en Nederland: jaarboek 2010. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
12.
Putte, Bart Van de & Erik Buyst. (2010). Occupational titles? Hard to eat, easy to catch. Lirias (KU Leuven). 40. 7–31.3 indexed citations
13.
Bracke, Piet, et al.. (2010). Sociologie, een hedendaagse inleiding. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
Putte, Bart Van de & Patrick Svensson. (2007). Measuring social structure in a rural context. Applying the SOCPO-scheme to Scania, Sweden (17th-20th century). Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 40. 249–293.2 indexed citations
16.
Putte, Bart Van de & Andrew Miles. (2006). Social power and class formation in the nineteenth century : how to measure class from occupation?. Lirias (KU Leuven).6 indexed citations
17.
Putte, Bart Van de & Andrew Miles. (2005). A social classification scheme for historical occupational data : partner selection and industrialism in Belgium and England, 1800-1918. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 38(2). 61–92.34 indexed citations
18.
Putte, Bart Van de. (2005). Partnerkeuze in de 19de eeuw. Klasse, geografische afkomst, romantiek en de vorming van sociale groepen op de huwelijksmarkt. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).7 indexed citations
Putte, Bart Van de, et al.. (2001). Huwen tijdens de Advent en de Vasten in de 19de eeuw in Vlaanderen. Lirias (KU Leuven). 31. 75–112.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.