Barbara Mercier
Impact in
- Neurology top 1%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Motor Control and Adaptation
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 3
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 2
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 3
- Co-authors
- Mitchell Glickstein (3 shared papers)Jack G. May (2 shared papers)M. Glickstein (3 shared papers)Ines Kralj‐Hans (2 shared papers)John Stein (1 shared paper)Jan Voogd (1 shared paper)Charles Legg (3 shared papers)Wang Xi (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (3 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Biomaterials (1 paper)Biology of the Cell (1 paper)Neuroscience Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Barbara Mercier
8 papers receiving 810 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Neurology 479
- Cognitive Neuroscience 482
- Sensory Systems 88
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 218
- Ophthalmology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Mercier
This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Mercier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Mercier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Mercier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Mercier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Mercier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Mercier. The network helps show where Barbara Mercier may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Mercier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 435 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 244 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 72 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 6 | Visual corticopontine and tectopontine projections in the macaque. | 1990 | 22 |
| 7 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 8 |
About Barbara Mercier
Barbara Mercier is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Biomedical Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 847 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (2 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (1 paper) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (479 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (482 citations), Sensory Systems (88 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (218 citations) and Ophthalmology (74 citations). Barbara Mercier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mitchell Glickstein, Jack G. May, M. Glickstein, Ines Kralj‐Hans, John Stein, Jan Voogd, Charles Legg, Wang Xi, Caterina Tomba and Béatrice Romagnolo. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biomaterials, Biology of the Cell and Neuroscience Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.