Barbara Hargrove
- Health top 10%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 1
- Religious studies top 5%
- Christian Theology and Mission 1
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 10
- Religion, Society, and Development 7
- Sociology and Cultural Identity Studies 1
- Psychology of Social Influence 1
- Philosophy top 10%
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 2
-
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs 1
- Co-authors
- Robert Ν. BellahPhillip E. HammondRichard John NeuhausAdair T. LummisDavid CaplovitzRichard K. FennAnn SwidlerWilliam M. Sullivan
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (1 paper)Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (8 papers)The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Barbara Hargrove
21 papers receiving 296 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Health 83
- Religious studies 41
- Sociology and Political Science 310
- Political Science and International Relations 117
- Philosophy 39
Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Hargrove
This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Hargrove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Hargrove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Hargrove more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Hargrove
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Hargrove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Hargrove. The network helps show where Barbara Hargrove may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Hargrove, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1986 | 72 | |
| 6 | The Emerging New Class: Implications for Church and Society | 1986 | 4 |
| 7 | 1985 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 68 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 22 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 131 | |
| 16 | 1980 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1980 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 27 | |
| 19 | 1972 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1972 | 1 |
About Barbara Hargrove
Barbara Hargrove is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies and Philosophy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (10 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Sociology and Cultural Identity Studies (1 paper), Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper), Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (83 citations), Religious studies (41 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (310 citations). Barbara Hargrove has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Ν. Bellah, Phillip E. Hammond, Richard John Neuhaus, Adair T. Lummis, David Caplovitz, Richard K. Fenn, Ann Swidler, William M. Sullivan, Dean R. Hoge and Richard Madsen. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.