Barbara Händel

1.9k total citations
24 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Barbara Händel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Barbara Händel has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Sensory Systems and 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Barbara Händel's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers). Barbara Händel is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers). Barbara Händel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Vietnam. Barbara Händel's co-authors include Ole Jensen, Thomas Haarmeier, Saskia Haegens, Bjørn P. Kaltenborn, Tore Bjerke, Eivin Røskaft, Liyu Cao, Peter Thier, W. Lutzenberger and Lynn Huestegge and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Barbara Händel

22 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Barbara Händel Germany 13 993 153 146 144 144 24 1.3k
Daniel J. Shaw Czechia 16 331 0.3× 81 0.5× 183 1.3× 70 0.5× 93 0.6× 61 750
Ian P. L. McLaren United Kingdom 23 1.5k 1.5× 89 0.6× 269 1.8× 220 1.5× 302 2.1× 100 2.2k
Lucy G. Cheke United Kingdom 21 448 0.5× 32 0.2× 360 2.5× 71 0.5× 153 1.1× 48 1.3k
Erin L. Rich United States 15 850 0.9× 181 1.2× 139 1.0× 361 2.5× 78 0.5× 24 1.6k
Bernhard H. Gaese Germany 13 644 0.6× 126 0.8× 35 0.2× 128 0.9× 92 0.6× 26 960
Arjen Stolk Netherlands 17 800 0.8× 63 0.4× 270 1.8× 123 0.9× 118 0.8× 39 1.2k
Katia Lehongre France 18 1.3k 1.3× 114 0.7× 71 0.5× 147 1.0× 202 1.4× 48 1.7k
Tilo Buschmann Germany 10 508 0.5× 35 0.2× 134 0.9× 117 0.8× 133 0.9× 13 1.2k
Robert Biegler Norway 10 338 0.3× 47 0.3× 99 0.7× 106 0.7× 72 0.5× 21 593

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Händel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Händel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Händel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Händel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Händel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Händel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Händel. The network helps show where Barbara Händel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barbara Händel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barbara Händel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barbara Händel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Barbara Händel. Barbara Händel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Händel, Barbara, et al.. (2025). A quantitative assessment of EOG eye tracking during free viewing in sighted and in congenitally blind. Brain Research. 1864. 149794–149794.
2.
Händel, Barbara, Saroj Biswas, Johannes Grohmann, et al.. (2024). Beyond-local neural information processing in neuronal networks. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 23. 4288–4305. 1 indexed citations
3.
Händel, Barbara, et al.. (2023). Reduced occipital alpha power marks a movement induced state change that facilitates creative thinking. Neuropsychologia. 193. 108743–108743.
4.
Steinborn, Michael B., et al.. (2022). Restoration of Attention by Rest in a Multitasking World: Theory, Methodology, and Empirical Evidence. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 867978–867978. 48 indexed citations
5.
Händel, Barbara, et al.. (2022). Motor restrictions impair divergent thinking during walking and during sitting. Psychological Research. 86(7). 2144–2157. 14 indexed citations
6.
Händel, Barbara, et al.. (2021). The Role of Blinks, Microsaccades and their Retinal Consequences in Bistable Motion Perception. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 647256–647256. 10 indexed citations
7.
Händel, Barbara, et al.. (2021). How the motor aspect of speaking influences the blink rate. PLoS ONE. 16(10). e0258322–e0258322. 10 indexed citations
8.
Händel, Barbara, et al.. (2021). The latency of spontaneous eye blinks marks relevant visual and auditory information processing. Journal of Vision. 21(6). 7–7. 12 indexed citations
9.
Händel, Barbara, et al.. (2020). Disentangling top-down and bottom-up influences on blinks in the visual and auditory domain. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 158. 400–410. 14 indexed citations
10.
Cao, Liyu & Barbara Händel. (2019). Walking enhances peripheral visual processing in humans. PLoS Biology. 17(10). e3000511–e3000511. 59 indexed citations
11.
Händel, Barbara & Marieke L. Schölvinck. (2017). The brain during free movement – What can we learn from the animal model. Brain Research. 1716. 3–15. 10 indexed citations
12.
Sauvigny, Thomas, et al.. (2014). Cortical representations of confidence in a visual perceptual decision. Nature Communications. 5(1). 3940–3940. 29 indexed citations
13.
Leeuwen, Tessa M. van, Peter Hagoort, & Barbara Händel. (2013). Real color captures attention and overrides spatial cues in grapheme-color synesthetes but not in controls. Neuropsychologia. 51(10). 1802–1813. 7 indexed citations
14.
Haegens, Saskia, Barbara Händel, & Ole Jensen. (2011). Top-Down Controlled Alpha Band Activity in Somatosensory Areas Determines Behavioral Performance in a Discrimination Task. Journal of Neuroscience. 31(14). 5197–5204. 353 indexed citations
15.
Händel, Barbara, Thomas Haarmeier, & Ole Jensen. (2010). Alpha Oscillations Correlate with the Successful Inhibition of Unattended Stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 23(9). 2494–2502. 351 indexed citations
16.
Händel, Barbara, Peter Thier, & Thomas Haarmeier. (2009). Visual Motion Perception Deficits Due to Cerebellar Lesions Are Paralleled by Specific Changes in Cerebro-Cortical Activity. Journal of Neuroscience. 29(48). 15126–15133. 38 indexed citations
17.
Händel, Barbara & Thomas Haarmeier. (2008). Cross-frequency coupling of brain oscillations indicates the success in visual motion discrimination. NeuroImage. 45(3). 1040–1046. 75 indexed citations
18.
Händel, Barbara, W. Lutzenberger, Peter Thier, & Thomas Haarmeier. (2008). Selective Attention Increases the Dependency of Cortical Responses on Visual Motion Coherence in Man. Cerebral Cortex. 18(12). 2902–2908. 15 indexed citations
19.
Händel, Barbara, et al.. (2007). Gamma oscillations underlying the visual motion aftereffect. NeuroImage. 38(4). 708–719. 6 indexed citations
20.
Händel, Barbara, W. Lutzenberger, Peter Thier, & Thomas Haarmeier. (2006). Opposite Dependencies on Visual Motion Coherence in Human Area MT+ and Early Visual Cortex. Cerebral Cortex. 17(7). 1542–1549. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026