Barbara Chapman

2.5k total citations
31 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Barbara Chapman is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Barbara Chapman has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 15 papers in Molecular Biology and 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Barbara Chapman's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (13 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers). Barbara Chapman is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (13 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers). Barbara Chapman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Barbara Chapman's co-authors include Andrew D. Huberman, Marla B. Feller, Michael P. Stryker, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Colenso M. Speer, Kathleen R. Zahs, Naoum P. Issa, Joshua T. Trachtenberg, Victoria L. Voith and Leo M. Chalupa and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Barbara Chapman

31 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Barbara Chapman

CMN

NEURO

Tim J. Viney United Kingdom

Justin C. Crowley United States

Wenzhi Sun China

Avi Chaudhuri Canada

David C. Lyon United States

Keisuke Yonehara Denmark

M. J. Friedlander United States

James A. Bourne Australia

Catherine A. Leamey Australia

Hannah L. Bernstein United States

Tim J. Viney United Kingdom

Barbara Chapman

1.8k ×1.4

CMN

1.1k ×1.2

918 ×1.2

183 ×1.2

NEURO

58 ×0.6

Citations per year, relative to Barbara Chapman Barbara Chapman (= 1×) peers Tim J. Viney

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Chapman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Chapman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Chapman. The network helps show where Barbara Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barbara Chapman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barbara Chapman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barbara Chapman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Barbara Chapman. Barbara Chapman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Davis, Zachary W., et al.. (2015). Epibatidine Blocks Eye-Specific Segregation in Ferret Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus during Stage III Retinal Waves. PLoS ONE. 10(3). e0118783–e0118783. 3 indexed citations

Davis, Zachary W., Barbara Chapman, & Hwai-Jong Cheng. (2015). Increasing Spontaneous Retinal Activity before Eye Opening Accelerates the Development of Geniculate Receptive Fields. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(43). 14612–14623. 12 indexed citations

Speer, Colenso M., Chao Sun, Lauren C. Liets, et al.. (2014). Eye-specific retinogeniculate segregation proceeds normally following disruption of patterned spontaneous retinal activity. Neural Development. 9(1). 25–25. 11 indexed citations

Speer, Colenso M., Chao Sun, & Barbara Chapman. (2011). Activity-dependent disruption of intersublaminar spaces and ABAKAN expression does not impact functional on and off organization in the ferret retinogeniculate system. Neural Development. 6(1). 7–7. 4 indexed citations

Rubin, Carol M., et al.. (2011). Mouse Mutants for the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor ß2 Subunit Display Changes in Cell Adhesion and Neurodegeneration Response Genes. PLoS ONE. 6(4). e18626–e18626. 9 indexed citations

Speer, Colenso M., Shawn Mikula, Andrew D. Huberman, & Barbara Chapman. (2009). The Developmental Remodeling of Eye‐Specific Afferents in the Ferret Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus. The Anatomical Record. 293(1). 1–24. 13 indexed citations

Sun, Chao, Colenso M. Speer, Guoyong Wang, Barbara Chapman, & Leo M. Chalupa. (2008). Epibatidine Application In Vitro Blocks Retinal Waves Without Silencing All Retinal Ganglion Cell Action Potentials in Developing Retina of the Mouse and Ferret. Journal of Neurophysiology. 100(6). 3253–3263. 28 indexed citations

Huberman, Andrew D., Colenso M. Speer, & Barbara Chapman. (2006). Spontaneous Retinal Activity Mediates Development of Ocular Dominance Columns and Binocular Receptive Fields in V1. Neuron. 52(2). 247–254. 95 indexed citations

Speer, Colenso M. & Barbara Chapman. (2005). Grading the thalamus: how can an ‘Eph’ be excellent?. PubMed. 3(3). 235–235. 1 indexed citations

10.

Huberman, Andrew D., Karl D. Murray, David K. Warland, David A. Feldheim, & Barbara Chapman. (2005). Ephrin-As mediate targeting of eye-specific projections to the lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience. 8(8). 1013–1021. 79 indexed citations

11.

Huberman, Andrew D., Guoyong Wang, Lauren C. Liets, et al.. (2003). Eye-Specific Retinogeniculate Segregation Independent of Normal Neuronal Activity. Science. 300(5621). 994–998. 93 indexed citations

12.

Huberman, Andrew D., David Stellwagen, & Barbara Chapman. (2002). Decoupling Eye-Specific Segregation from Lamination in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience. 22(21). 9419–9429. 69 indexed citations

13.

Chapman, Barbara, et al.. (1999). Development of orientation preference in the mammalian visual cortex. Journal of Neurobiology. 41(1). 18–24. 43 indexed citations

14.

Issa, Naoum P., Joshua T. Trachtenberg, Barbara Chapman, Kathleen R. Zahs, & Michael P. Stryker. (1999). The Critical Period for Ocular Dominance Plasticity in the Ferret’s Visual Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 19(16). 6965–6978. 178 indexed citations

15.

Chapman, Barbara & Leland S. Stone. (1996). Turning a Blind Eye to Cortical Receptive Fields. Neuron. 16(1). 9–12. 21 indexed citations

16.

Chapman, Barbara, Mattie J. Hendrick, & Robert J. Washabau. (1993). Granulomatous hepatitis in dogs: Nine cases (1987–1990). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 203(5). 680–684. 12 indexed citations

17.

Chapman, Barbara & Michael P. Stryker. (1992). Origin of orientation tuning in the visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2(4). 498–501. 28 indexed citations

18.

Chapman, Barbara. (1991). Feline Aggression. Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice. 21(2). 315–327. 18 indexed citations

19.

Chapman, Barbara & Victoria L. Voith. (1990). Cat aggression redirected to people: 14 cases (1981-1987). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 196(6). 947–950. 15 indexed citations

20.

Chapman, Barbara & Victoria L. Voith. (1990). Behavioral problems in old dogs: 26 cases (1984-1987). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 196(6). 944–946. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact