Barbara Bubak

544 total citations
8 papers, 400 citations indexed

About

Barbara Bubak is a scholar working on Ecology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Microbiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Barbara Bubak has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 400 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Ecology, 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Microbiology. Recurrent topics in Barbara Bubak's work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers). Barbara Bubak is often cited by papers focused on Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers). Barbara Bubak collaborates with scholars based in Poland, Slovakia and Spain. Barbara Bubak's co-authors include Ewa Jończyk‐Matysiak, Andrzej Górski, Jarosław Drapała, Katarzyna Hodyra‐Stefaniak, Dorota Lecion, Paulina Miernikiewicz, Marek Harhala, Joanna Majewska, Zuzanna Kaźmierczak and Anna Kłopot and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Scientific Reports and Frontiers in Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Barbara Bubak

8 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Barbara Bubak Poland	7	314	111	106	102	87	8	400
Flavie Pouillot France	10	423 1.3×	257 2.3×	165 1.6×	85 0.8×	114 1.3×	10	603
Andrei Trostel United States	8	391 1.2×	265 2.4×	154 1.5×	52 0.5×	67 0.8×	8	604
Asako Muraoka Japan	6	476 1.5×	219 2.0×	245 2.3×	71 0.7×	65 0.7×	7	563
Jessica Sacher Canada	12	362 1.2×	169 1.5×	127 1.2×	49 0.5×	62 0.7×	20	454
J.M. Otero Spain	6	396 1.3×	137 1.2×	108 1.0×	63 0.6×	52 0.6×	9	437
Natalia Bagińska Poland	12	347 1.1×	159 1.4×	155 1.5×	46 0.5×	56 0.6×	13	501
Iwona Dąbrowska Poland	6	186 0.6×	94 0.8×	82 0.8×	29 0.3×	39 0.4×	8	314
Joan Colom Spain	9	462 1.5×	188 1.7×	124 1.2×	62 0.6×	61 0.7×	15	536
Masatoshi Yoichi Japan	9	504 1.6×	168 1.5×	139 1.3×	71 0.7×	91 1.0×	10	575
Sylwia Parasion Poland	7	361 1.1×	190 1.7×	203 1.9×	28 0.3×	47 0.5×	7	417

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Bubak

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Bubak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Bubak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Bubak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Bubak

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Bubak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Bubak. The network helps show where Barbara Bubak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barbara Bubak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barbara Bubak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barbara Bubak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Barbara Bubak. Barbara Bubak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Międzybrodzki, Ryszard, Marlena Kłak, Ewa Jończyk‐Matysiak, et al.. (2017). Means to Facilitate the Overcoming of Gastric Juice Barrier by a Therapeutic Staphylococcal Bacteriophage A5/80. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8. 467–467. 53 indexed citations

2.

Międzybrodzki, Ryszard, Jan Borysowski, Marlena Kłak, et al.. (2017). In VivoStudies on the Influence of Bacteriophage Preparations on the Autoimmune Inflammatory Process. BioMed Research International. 2017. 1–9. 30 indexed citations

3.

Hodyra‐Stefaniak, Katarzyna, Paulina Miernikiewicz, Jarosław Drapała, et al.. (2015). Mammalian Host-Versus-Phage immune response determines phage fate in vivo. Scientific Reports. 5(1). 14802–14802. 221 indexed citations

4.

Jończyk‐Matysiak, Ewa, Marzanna Łusiak-Szelachowska, Marlena Kłak, et al.. (2015). The Effect of Bacteriophage Preparations on Intracellular Killing of Bacteria by Phagocytes. Journal of Immunology Research. 2015. 1–13. 42 indexed citations

5.

Gulewicz, Piotr, Barbara Bubak, Juana Frı́as, et al.. (2001). Biological Activity of α-Galactoside Preparations from Lupinus angustifolius L. and Pisum sativum L. Seeds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 50(2). 384–389. 27 indexed citations

6.

Kotz, Joanne, et al.. (1994). Studies on the effect of organophosphorus pesticide phosalone on mouse immune system.. PubMed. 34(3-4). 221–30. 2 indexed citations

7.

Bubak, Barbara, et al.. (1992). Studies on effect of pesticide Chlorfenwinfos on mouse immune system.. PubMed. 40(5-6). 283–9. 6 indexed citations

8.

Bubak, Barbara, et al.. (1990). Immunological profile of animals exposed to pesticide--deltamethrin.. PubMed. 38(3-4). 229–38. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact