Baptist Gallwitz
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Surgery top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wolfgang E. SchmidtRolf MentleinMaximilian von EynattenJulio RosenstockSanjay PatelKlaus A. DugiT. RauchHans‐Juergen Woerle
- Topics
- Diabetes Treatment and Management (54 papers)Diabetes Management and Research (31 papers)Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (24 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetPLoS ONEDiabetes Care
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Baptist Gallwitz
69 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.9k
- Molecular Biology 812
- Surgery 708
- Oncology 671
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 562
Countries citing papers authored by Baptist Gallwitz
This map shows the geographic impact of Baptist Gallwitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Baptist Gallwitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Baptist Gallwitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Baptist Gallwitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Baptist Gallwitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Baptist Gallwitz. The network helps show where Baptist Gallwitz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Baptist Gallwitz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Baptist Gallwitz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Baptist Gallwitz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Baptist Gallwitz. Baptist Gallwitz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 238 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | Praxisempfehlungen DDG/DGIM : Therapie des Typ-2-Diabetes | 6 |
| 11 | 277 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 55 | |
| 19 | 75 | |
| 20 | 79 |
About Baptist Gallwitz
Baptist Gallwitz is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Genetics and Pharmacology, having authored 87 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Treatment and Management (54 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (31 papers) and Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.9k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (562 citations) and Oncology (671 citations). Baptist Gallwitz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang E. Schmidt, Rolf Mentlein, Maximilian von Eynatten, Julio Rosenstock, Sanjay Patel, Klaus A. Dugi, T. Rauch, Hans‐Juergen Woerle, Sudipta Bhattacharya and Erhard Siegel. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and Diabetes Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.