Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Thomas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Thomas. The network helps show where B. Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Thomas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Thomas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Thomas. B. Thomas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Teuben, Peter, Marc W. Pound, B. Thomas, & Elizabeth Warner. (2019). Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVIII.. 523.6 indexed citations
4.
Thomas, B., et al.. (2015). Learning from FITS: Limitations in use in modern astronomical research. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).15 indexed citations
5.
Thomas, B., Tim Jenness, Frossie Economou, et al.. (2014). Significant Problems in FITS Limit Its Use in Modern Astronomical Research. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 485. 351.3 indexed citations
6.
Thomas, B., E. Shaya, & Cynthia Cheung. (2001). Converting FITS into XML: Methods and Advantages. ASPC. 238. 487.2 indexed citations
7.
Shaya, E., K. D. Borne, B. Thomas, & Cynthia Cheung. (2001). Publishing Scientific Articles in XML.. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 199.1 indexed citations
8.
Shaya, E., B. Thomas, & Cynthia Cheung. (2001). Specifics on a XML Data Format for Scientific Data. 238. 217.3 indexed citations
9.
Thomas, B., et al.. (2000). An XML Representation of FITS - Introducing FITSML. AAS. 197.1 indexed citations
10.
Shaya, E., et al.. (1999). XML at the ADC: Steps to a Next Generation Data Archive. AAS. 194.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.