This map shows the geographic impact of B Shackel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B Shackel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B Shackel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B Shackel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B Shackel. The network helps show where B Shackel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B Shackel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B Shackel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B Shackel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B Shackel. B Shackel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shackel, B, Simon Beecham, David Pezzaniti, & Baden Myers. (2008). Design of permeable pavements for Australian conditions.12 indexed citations
3.
Shackel, B, et al.. (2003). FATIGUE CHARACTERISATION OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE USING DISSIPATED ENERGY APPROACH.1 indexed citations
4.
Shackel, B, et al.. (2003). PERMEABLE CONCRETE ECO-PAVING AS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE IN AUSTRALIAN URBAN ROAD ENGINEERING.6 indexed citations
5.
Shackel, B, et al.. (2003). ACCELERATED TRAFFICKING TESTS OF CONCRETE FLAG PAVING.
6.
Shackel, B, et al.. (2002). An experimental study of unbound base materials for use in permeable pavements.1 indexed citations
7.
Shackel, B, et al.. (2001). THE DESIGN OF FLAG PAVEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC.1 indexed citations
8.
Shackel, B & Simon Richardson. (1991). Human factors for informatics usability—background and overview. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 1–19.10 indexed citations
9.
Shackel, B. (1991). Usability—context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 21–37.263 indexed citations
10.
Shackel, B. (1990). Design and construction of interlocking concrete block pavements. Elsevier eBooks.29 indexed citations
11.
Shackel, B. (1990). Human factors and usability. Human-Computer Interaction. 27–41.40 indexed citations
12.
Shackel, B. (1987). An Overview of Research on Electronic Journals.. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 193–206.1 indexed citations
Shackel, B. (1982). LOADING AND ACCELERATED TRAFFICKING EVALUATIONS OF HEAVY DUTY INTERLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCK PAVEMENTS IN FREMANTLE. Australian road research. 11.1 indexed citations
15.
Shackel, B. (1979). AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE RESPONSE OF INTERLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCK PAVEMENTS TO SIMULATED TRAFFIC LOADING.1 indexed citations
16.
Shackel, B, et al.. (1977). THE APPLICATION OF A FULL-SCALE ROAD SIMULATOR TO THE STUDY OF HIGHWAY PAVEMENTS. Australian road research. 8(2).2 indexed citations
17.
Shackel, B, et al.. (1974). The response of a foamed bitumen stabilised soil to repeated triaxial loading. 7(7).3 indexed citations
18.
Shackel, B. (1973). CHANGES IN SOIL SUCTION IN A SAND-CLAY SUBJECTED TO REPEATED TRIAXIAL LOADING. Highway Research Record.6 indexed citations
19.
Shackel, B. (1973). REPEATED LOADING OF SOILS - A REVIEW. Australian road research. 5(3).5 indexed citations
20.
Shackel, B. (1970). A RESEARCH APPARATUS FOR SUBJECTING PAVEMENT MATERIALS TO REPEATED TRIAXIAL LOADING. Australian road research.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.