B. Pitt

16 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

B. Pitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 220
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 71
  • Surgery 59
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 53
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 48
Replace P Bopp with:
P Bopp Switzerland
Donald Hall Germany
H Klepzig Germany
Henri Van Mechelen Belgium
Gr. Heyndrickx Belgium
Kishio Maekawa Japan
D S Thompson United Kingdom
Masuki Mori Japan
Heather D. Nisbet New Zealand
John Shillingford United Kingdom
B. Pitt relative to P Bopp Switzerland P Bopp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
P Bopp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Pitt. The network helps show where B. Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Pitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. Pitt. B. Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 23
2
Statin therapy and clinical outcomes in acute heart failure patients complicating acute myocardial infarction : insights from the EPHESUS trial
2
3 10
4 3
5 24
6
Theoretical basis for the use of angiotensin II antagonists in the treatment of heart failure.
9
7
Effect of cold stress on coronary sinus blood flow in patients with scleroderma.
4
8 6
9
Effect of acupuncture on left ventricular size and function assessed by echocardiography in patients with stable dilated cardiomyopathy.
6
10 12
11 94
12
Determination of extraction fraction by a double-tracer method.
6
13 13
14 11
15 64
16 11

About B. Pitt

B. Pitt is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pharmacology and Nephrology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (4 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (3 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (220 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (71 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (53 citations). B. Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Clayton H. Kallman, M L Weisfeldt, Lewis C. Becker, Gary Gerstenblith, Kenneth Silverman, J L Weiss, Bernadine H. Bulkley, John T. Flaherty, Y Sugishita and C. N. Gillis. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Cardiovascular Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026