B. Mundkur

413 total citations
15 papers, 290 citations indexed

About

B. Mundkur is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Food Science and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, B. Mundkur has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 290 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Food Science and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in B. Mundkur's work include Fungal and yeast genetics research (7 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (5 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (4 papers). B. Mundkur is often cited by papers focused on Fungal and yeast genetics research (7 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (5 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (4 papers). B. Mundkur collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. B. Mundkur's co-authors include Friedrich Kiermeier and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Genetics and Journal of Bacteriology.

In The Last Decade

B. Mundkur

15 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
B. Mundkur United States 10 194 62 37 27 21 15 290
Peter J. SCHOPPINK Netherlands 8 417 2.1× 77 1.2× 21 0.6× 41 1.5× 19 0.9× 8 456
S. I. Alikhanian Russia 11 210 1.1× 65 1.0× 14 0.4× 21 0.8× 17 0.8× 37 296
Nobuyoshi IGUCHI Japan 12 274 1.4× 75 1.2× 89 2.4× 14 0.5× 156 7.4× 38 385
Marie-Louise Bach France 10 400 2.1× 59 1.0× 25 0.7× 32 1.2× 30 1.4× 11 424
Anne-Marie Ribet France 8 352 1.8× 31 0.5× 35 0.9× 18 0.7× 26 1.2× 11 371
Jean S. Humphreys United States 9 269 1.4× 85 1.4× 5 0.1× 48 1.8× 18 0.9× 13 367
N.C. Mishra United States 11 292 1.5× 141 2.3× 9 0.2× 33 1.2× 21 1.0× 36 403
Manda E. Gent United Kingdom 9 250 1.3× 73 1.2× 43 1.2× 60 2.2× 51 2.4× 13 302
Donald W. MacDonald United Kingdom 12 297 1.5× 124 2.0× 25 0.7× 9 0.3× 23 1.1× 18 439
Laurens Sierkstra Netherlands 9 315 1.6× 80 1.3× 44 1.2× 30 1.1× 34 1.6× 10 369

Countries citing papers authored by B. Mundkur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Mundkur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Mundkur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Mundkur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Mundkur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Mundkur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Mundkur. The network helps show where B. Mundkur may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Mundkur

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Mundkur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Mundkur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. Mundkur. B. Mundkur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Mundkur, B., et al.. (1968). Amido black 10B as a nucleolar stain for lymph nodes in Hodgkin's disease.. PubMed. 12(3). 218–26. 1 indexed citations
2.
Mundkur, B.. (1967). The submicroscopic basophile structure of chromosomes in Ehrlich ascites tumor cells.. PubMed. 27(4). 686–702. 5 indexed citations
3.
Mundkur, B., et al.. (1966). SELECTIVE LOCALIZATION OF NUCLEOLAR PROTEIN WITH AMIDO BLACK 10B. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 14(1). 94–103. 14 indexed citations
4.
Mundkur, B.. (1965). Bifunctional cross-linking reagents and the fine structure of protein in Ehrlich ascites tumor cell nuclei.. PubMed. 25(7). 1035–51. 3 indexed citations
5.
Mundkur, B.. (1964). Electron microscopical studies of frozen-dried yeast. Experimental Cell Research. 34(1). 155–181. 12 indexed citations
6.
Mundkur, B.. (1964). Submicroscopic cytochemical organization of interphase nuclei revealed by protein reagents and gallocyanin-chromalum. Cell and Tissue Research. 63(1). 52–80. 11 indexed citations
7.
Mundkur, B., et al.. (1963). Electron Microscopical Studies of Frozen-Dried Yeast. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung B. 18(12). 1073–1081. 5 indexed citations
8.
Mundkur, B.. (1961). Electron microscopical studies of frozen-dried yeast. Experimental Cell Research. 25(1). 24–40. 24 indexed citations
9.
Mundkur, B.. (1961). Electron microscopical studies of frozen-dried yeast. Experimental Cell Research. 25(1). 1–23. 42 indexed citations
10.
Mundkur, B.. (1960). Electron microscopical studies of frozen-dried yeast. Experimental Cell Research. 20(1). 28–42. 70 indexed citations
11.
Mundkur, B.. (1960). Submicroscopic morphology of frozen-dried yeast. Experimental Cell Research. 21(1). 201–205. 18 indexed citations
12.
Mundkur, B.. (1954). THE NUCLEUS OF SACCHAROMYCES: A CYTOLOGICAL STUDY OF A FROZEN-DRIED POLYPLOID SERIES. Journal of Bacteriology. 68(5). 514–529. 36 indexed citations
13.
Mundkur, B.. (1953). Interphase nuclei and cell sizes in a polyploid series of saccharomyces. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 9(10). 373–374. 23 indexed citations
14.
Mundkur, B.. (1953). Mitochondrial Distribution in Saccharomyces. Nature. 171(4357). 793–794. 19 indexed citations
15.
Mundkur, B.. (1952). LONG TERM ADAPTATION TO GALACTOSE BY YEAST. Genetics. 37(5). 484–499. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026