Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Peritoneal Colorectal Carcinomatosis Treated With Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Retrospective Analysis of 523 Patients From a Multicentric French Study
2009706 citationsDominique Élias, François Noël Gilly et al.Journal of Clinical Oncologyprofile →
Toward curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from nonovarian origin by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy
2010394 citationsOlivier Gléhen, François Noël Gilly et al.Cancerprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Mansvelt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Mansvelt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Mansvelt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Mansvelt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Mansvelt. The network helps show where B. Mansvelt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Mansvelt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Mansvelt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Mansvelt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Mansvelt. B. Mansvelt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gléhen, Olivier, François Noël Gilly, Florent Boutitie, et al.. (2010). Toward curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from nonovarian origin by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Cancer. 116(24). 5608–5618.394 indexed citations breakdown →
Élias, Dominique, François Noël Gilly, Florent Boutitie, et al.. (2009). Peritoneal Colorectal Carcinomatosis Treated With Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Retrospective Analysis of 523 Patients From a Multicentric French Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 28(1). 63–68.706 indexed citations breakdown →
Mansvelt, B., et al.. (1997). [Study of the toxicity and results of intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy in 28 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis].. PubMed. 51(1). 60–7.18 indexed citations
15.
Mansvelt, B., et al.. (1995). Utilization of gas heater humidifier in the course of coelioscopies.. PubMed. 95(2). 100–2.3 indexed citations
16.
Mansvelt, B., et al.. (1994). [Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Free intraperitoneal calculi].. PubMed. 48(7). 641–3.1 indexed citations
Huguet, C, et al.. (1992). [Is extracorporeal liver surgery useful for difficult hepatic resections?].. PubMed. 46(1). 24–8.1 indexed citations
19.
Mansvelt, B., et al.. (1992). [Minimal intestinal preparation before colectomy for cancer. Experience of 189 cases].. PubMed. 46(7). 592–5.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.