B. Hupkens

1.7k total citations
15 papers, 444 citations indexed

About

B. Hupkens is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, B. Hupkens has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 444 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Oncology, 8 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in B. Hupkens's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (14 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (8 papers) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (6 papers). B. Hupkens is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (14 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (8 papers) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (6 papers). B. Hupkens collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Denmark. B. Hupkens's co-authors include Geerard L. Beets, Stéphanie O. Breukink, Jarno Melenhorst, Regina G. H. Beets‐Tan, Maaike Berbée, Milou H. Martens, Jan H.M.B. Stoot, Monique Maas, Marit E. van der Sande and Doenja M. J. Lambregts and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Cancer, Annals of Surgical Oncology and Radiotherapy and Oncology.

In The Last Decade

B. Hupkens

15 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
B. Hupkens Netherlands	8	426	303	91	82	15	15	444
Peter How United Kingdom	8	436 1.0×	377 1.2×	56 0.6×	69 0.8×	28 1.9×	13	467
Oliver C. Shihab United Kingdom	10	551 1.3×	498 1.6×	134 1.5×	87 1.1×	18 1.2×	10	633
Joachim Straßburg Germany	12	526 1.2×	437 1.4×	90 1.0×	118 1.4×	5 0.3×	25	558
Harm Rutten Netherlands	4	421 1.0×	356 1.2×	32 0.4×	79 1.0×	12 0.8×	8	438
Marit E. van der Sande Netherlands	6	236 0.6×	145 0.5×	82 0.9×	39 0.5×	7 0.5×	9	254
Jean François Bosset France	11	200 0.5×	295 1.0×	56 0.6×	223 2.7×	12 0.8×	14	408
Maire Ratasvuori Finland	7	188 0.4×	271 0.9×	41 0.5×	69 0.8×	14 0.9×	8	302
M. A. Bali Belgium	8	187 0.4×	190 0.6×	106 1.2×	56 0.7×	8 0.5×	14	400
Carlo D’Orta Italy	8	234 0.5×	208 0.7×	64 0.7×	184 2.2×	7 0.5×	12	376
Anne Kirstine Arveschoug Denmark	10	154 0.4×	82 0.3×	83 0.9×	76 0.9×	7 0.5×	22	318

Countries citing papers authored by B. Hupkens

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Hupkens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Hupkens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Hupkens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Hupkens

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Hupkens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Hupkens. The network helps show where B. Hupkens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Hupkens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Hupkens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Hupkens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. Hupkens. B. Hupkens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Hupkens, B., et al.. (2025). Out-of-field dose assessment for pencil beam scanning proton radiotherapy versus photon radiotherapy for breast cancer in pregnant women. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology. 33. 100721–100721. 2 indexed citations

Custers, Petra A., B. Hupkens, Brechtje A. Grotenhuis, et al.. (2022). Selected stage IV rectal cancer patients managed by the watch‐and‐wait approach after pelvic radiotherapy: a good alternative to total mesorectal excision surgery?. Colorectal Disease. 24(4). 401–410. 7 indexed citations

Hupkens, B., Marnix G. Witte, Philip Meijnen, et al.. (2022). Development of a consensus-based delineation guideline for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 177. 214–221. 4 indexed citations

Hupkens, B., Stéphanie O. Breukink, Jan H.M.B. Stoot, et al.. (2020). Oncological Outcomes and Hospital Costs of the Treatment in Patients With Rectal Cancer: Watch-and-Wait Policy and Standard Surgical Treatment. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 63(5). 598–605. 4 indexed citations

Lambregts, Doenja M. J., Monique Maas, Thierry N. Boellaard, et al.. (2019). Long-term imaging characteristics of clinical complete responders during watch-and-wait for rectal cancer—an evaluation of over 1500 MRIs. European Radiology. 30(1). 272–280. 23 indexed citations

Hupkens, B., Stéphanie O. Breukink, Jan H.M.B. Stoot, et al.. (2019). Hospital costs and oncological outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer – standard treatment and watch-and-wait policy. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 45(2). e111–e111. 2 indexed citations

Sande, Marit E. van der, Geerard L. Beets, B. Hupkens, et al.. (2018). Response assessment after (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Why are we missing complete responses with MRI and endoscopy?. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 45(6). 1011–1017. 43 indexed citations

Sande, Marit E. van der, B. Hupkens, Maaike Berbée, et al.. (2018). Impact of radiotherapy on anorectal function in patients with rectal cancer following a watch and wait programme. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 132. 79–84. 37 indexed citations

Hupkens, B., Stéphanie O. Breukink, Pieter J. Tanis, et al.. (2018). Dutch validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Colorectal Disease. 20(10). 881–887. 40 indexed citations

10.

Hupkens, B., Monique Maas, Milou H. Martens, et al.. (2017). Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer After Chemoradiation: Should We Extend the Observation Period in Patients with a Clinical Near-Complete Response?. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 25(1). 197–203. 89 indexed citations

11.

Hupkens, B., Milou H. Martens, Jan H.M.B. Stoot, et al.. (2017). Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer Patients After Chemoradiation: Watch-and-Wait Policy Versus Standard Resection – A Matched-Controlled Study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 60(10). 1032–1040. 173 indexed citations

12.

Hupkens, B., Monique Maas, Milou H. Martens, et al.. (2017). MRI surveillance for the detection of local recurrence in rectal cancer after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. European Radiology. 27(12). 4960–4969. 13 indexed citations

13.

Lambregts, Doenja M. J., Monique Maas, Andrea Delli Pizzi, et al.. (2017). Long-term follow-up features on rectal MRI during a ‘watch-and-wait’ approach in clinical complete responders after chemoradiotherapy: an update of 140 patients. European Journal of Cancer. 72. S54–S54. 3 indexed citations

14.

Sande, Marianne A. B. van der, Monique Maas, B. Hupkens, et al.. (2016). 51. Pathological complete responders after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: What can be learned from MRI and endoscopy for the selection of complete responders?. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 42(9). S86–S86. 1 indexed citations

15.

Hupkens, B., Doenja M. J. Lambregts, Marianne A. B. van der Sande, et al.. (2015). 2001 Anorectal function after watch and wait-policy in rectal cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer. 51. S327–S327. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact