Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A comparison of various definitions of contractive mappings
1977542 citationsΒ. E. RhoadesTransactions of the American Mathematical Societyprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Β. E. Rhoades's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Β. E. Rhoades with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Β. E. Rhoades more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Β. E. Rhoades. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Β. E. Rhoades. The network helps show where Β. E. Rhoades may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Β. E. Rhoades
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Β. E. Rhoades.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Β. E. Rhoades based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Β. E. Rhoades. Β. E. Rhoades is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rhoades, Β. E.. (2015). SOME CLASSES OF DOUBLY INFINITE MATRICES. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
3.
Dhage, Bapurao C. & Β. E. Rhoades. (2015). PROVING FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN D-METRIC SPACES VIA GENERAL EXISTENCE PRINCIPLES. 34(4).
4.
Savaş, Ekrem, et al.. (2011). ON $q$-HAUSDORFF MATRICES. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics. 15(6). 2429–2437.4 indexed citations
5.
Patterson, Richard F. & Β. E. Rhoades. (2009). Four-dimensional matrix transformation and the double Gibbs' phenomenon. Mathematical communications. 14(1). 7–12.2 indexed citations
6.
Abbas, Mujahid, Β. E. Rhoades, & Talat Nazir. (2009). Common fixed points of generalized contractive multivalued mappings in cone metric spaces. Mathematical communications. 14(2). 365–378.2 indexed citations
7.
Abbas, Mujahid & Β. E. Rhoades. (2008). Common fixed point theorems for occasionally weakly compatible mappings satisfying a generalized contractive condition. Mathematical communications. 13(2). 295–301.18 indexed citations
8.
Rhoades, Β. E.. (1996). A fixed point theorem for a multivalued non-self mapping. Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae. 37(2). 401–404.16 indexed citations
9.
Rhoades, Β. E.. (1986). Common fixed point theorems for three mappings under a weak commutativity condition. 17. 47–67.11 indexed citations
Rhoades, Β. E., et al.. (1982). Fixed points for generalized nonexpansive mappings. Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae. 23(3). 443–451.5 indexed citations
12.
Rhoades, Β. E., et al.. (1979). A Class of Fixed Point Theorems. Mathematics seminar notes. 7(3). 477–489.2 indexed citations
Rhoades, Β. E.. (1977). A comparison of various definitions of contractive mappings. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 226(0). 257–290.542 indexed citations breakdown →
Rhoades, Β. E.. (1961). Hausdorff summability methods. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 101(3). 396–425.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.