B. C. Crooker
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 11
- Theoretical and Computational Physics 5
-
- Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials 10
-
- Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics 9
- Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research 6
- Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates 6
- Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices 5
- Magnetic properties of thin films 5
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- I. MiotkowskiPaul ShandT. M. PekarekJ. D. ReppyB. HébralM. McElfreshJ. M. HonigK. Sreedhar
- Cited by
- Condensed Matter PhysicsElectronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Partner nations
- United StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
B. C. Crooker
31 papers receiving 814 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Condensed Matter Physics 357
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 322
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 417
- Materials Chemistry 383
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 165
Countries citing papers authored by B. C. Crooker
This map shows the geographic impact of B. C. Crooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. C. Crooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. C. Crooker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by B. C. Crooker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. C. Crooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. C. Crooker. The network helps show where B. C. Crooker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside B. C. Crooker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 2 | Growth and Characterization of Fe Doped InSb Films | 2001 | 3 |
| 3 | 2001 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 22 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 25 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 226 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 9 |
About B. C. Crooker
B. C. Crooker is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 833 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (11 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (10 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (9 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (6 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (6 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (5 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (5 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (357 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (322 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (417 citations). B. C. Crooker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include I. Miotkowski, Paul Shand, T. M. Pekarek, J. D. Reppy, B. Hébral, M. McElfresh, J. M. Honig, K. Sreedhar, J. Spałek and M. Darwin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.