Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits
19991.3k citationsOlivier Thellin, Willy Zorzi et al.Journal of Biotechnologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B Borman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B Borman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B Borman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B Borman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B Borman. The network helps show where B Borman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B Borman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B Borman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B Borman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B Borman. B Borman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Thellin, Olivier, Willy Zorzi, Bernard Lakaye, et al.. (1999). Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits. Journal of Biotechnology. 75(2-3). 291–295.1293 indexed citations breakdown →
Borman, B, et al.. (1999). Socio-demographic characteristics of New Zealand smokers: results from the 1996 census.. PubMed. 112(1101). 460–3.23 indexed citations
8.
Thellin, Olivier, Willy Zorzi, Bernard Lakaye, et al.. (1999). Short communication Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits.2 indexed citations
Thompson, John, EA Mitchell, & B Borman. (1994). Sex specific birthweight percentiles by gestational age for New Zealand.. PubMed. 107(970). 1–3.53 indexed citations
Pearce, Neil, E W Pomare, Stephen W. Marshall, & B Borman. (1993). Mortality and social class in Maori and nonMaori New Zealand men: changes between 1975-7 and 1985-7.. PubMed. 106(956). 193–6.29 indexed citations
Thompson, John, et al.. (1991). No association between fluoridation of water supplies and sudden infant death syndrome.. PubMed. 104(924). 500–1.1 indexed citations
15.
Pearce, Neil, Stephen W. Marshall, & B Borman. (1991). Undiminished social class mortality differences in New Zealand men.. PubMed. 104(910). 153–6.18 indexed citations
16.
Borman, B, et al.. (1990). Risk factors for low birthweight in New Zealand, 1981-83.. PubMed. 103(885). 92–4.5 indexed citations
17.
Bandaranayake, Don, et al.. (1990). Domestic unintentional injuries presenting to the accident and emergency departments in the Wellington region.. PubMed. 103(901). 528–31.1 indexed citations
18.
Linton, MacRae F., et al.. (1988). Caesarean section: a national study.. PubMed. 101(852). 534–5.1 indexed citations
19.
Borman, B, et al.. (1988). A national study of sudden infant death syndrome in New Zealand.. PubMed. 101(848). 413–5.22 indexed citations
20.
Borman, B, et al.. (1986). Sports injuries in New Zealand.. PubMed. 99(814). 899–901.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.