B Booth

670 citations
17 papers · 535 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

B Booth

17 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

B Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Pharmacology 171
  • Statistics and Probability 79
  • Pharmaceutical Science 41
  • Oncology 173
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 80
Replace Nam Atiqur Rahman with:
Nam Atiqur Rahman United States
K S Reynolds United States
Satjit Brar United States
Eleanor Howgate United Kingdom
Manuela Grimstein United States
Mikael S. Thomsen Denmark
Nikolaos Tsamandouras United States
Donato Teutonico France
Daria Stypinski United States
Madelé van Dyk Australia
B Booth relative to Nam Atiqur Rahman United States Nam Atiqur Rahman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nam Atiqur Rahman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B Booth. The network helps show where B Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside B Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B Booth Line = papers co-authored together B Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2010402
2 201451
3 201743
4 20089
5
The knowledge nurses need to educate patients about stroke.
19944
6 20034
7 20193
8 20033
9
Does it really matter at that age?
19903
10 20113
11 20102
12
Stroke. The role of the nurse.
19962
13
Complementary medicine. Aromatherapy.
19942
14 20111
15
The euthanasia debate: how NT readers view the issues.
19951
16 20031
17
Latex allergy: a growing problem in health care.
19961

About B Booth

B Booth is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (171 citations), Statistics and Probability (79 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (41 citations), Oncology (173 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (80 citations). B Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Rajanikanth Madabushi, K S Reynolds, Ping Zhao, Ta C. Wu, Eva Gil Berglund, Joseph A. Grillo, Satjit Brar, Pengfei Song, L J Lesko and Nam Atiqur Rahman. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Journal of Clinical Oncology, The AAPS Journal and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact