Audrius Čereška

428 citations
29 papers · 283 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Audrius Čereška

21 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Audrius Čereška
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Management Science and Operations Research 100
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 36
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 16
  • Strategy and Management 33
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 1
Replace Abit Balın with:
Abit Balın Türkiye
Pablo Viveros Chile
Paweł Gołda Poland
S. Saravanasankar India
Swapandeep Kaur India
Igor Miljanović Serbia
Miloš Tanasijević Serbia
Alexandre Ferreira de Pinho Brazil
Ali Lashgari Iran
Goutam Kumar Bose India
Audrius Čereška relative to Abit Balın Türkiye Abit Balın's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Abit Balın · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Audrius Čereška

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Audrius Čereška's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Audrius Čereška with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Audrius Čereška more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Audrius Čereška

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Audrius Čereška. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Audrius Čereška. The network helps show where Audrius Čereška may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Audrius Čereška, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Audrius Čereška Line = papers co-authored together Audrius Čereška links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201951
2 202036
3 201834
4 201633
5 201633
6 202328
7 201621
8 201814
9 20208
10 20206
11 20143
12 20183
13 20122
14 20212
15 20161
16 20061
17 20051
18 20131
19 20061
20 20041

About Audrius Čereška

Audrius Čereška is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Piezoelectric Actuators and Control (5 papers), Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability (5 papers), Engineering Technology and Methodologies (4 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (3 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers), Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis (3 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (2 papers) and Advanced machining processes and optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (100 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (36 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (16 citations), Strategy and Management (33 citations) and Nuclear Energy and Engineering (1 citation). Audrius Čereška has collaborated with scholars based in Lithuania, Italy and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Valentinas Podvezko, Kristina Čižiūnienė, Jonas Matijošius, Kristina Kilikevičienė, Aldona Jarašūnienė, Artūras Kilikevičius, Romualdas Baušys, Alfredas Rimkus and Jalil Heidary Dahooie. Their work appears in journals such as Energies, Sustainability, Atmosphere, Metals and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact