Atanas Ignatov
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genetics top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Tanja IgnatovHolm EggemannSerban Dan CostaThomas KalinskiOlaf OrtmannAlbert RoessnerElke BurgerJoachim Bischoff
- Topics
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (36 papers)Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (29 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (19 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologyJournal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
In The Last Decade
Atanas Ignatov
124 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Molecular Biology 842
- Genetics 763
- Oncology 670
- Cancer Research 534
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 395
Countries citing papers authored by Atanas Ignatov
This map shows the geographic impact of Atanas Ignatov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Atanas Ignatov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Atanas Ignatov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Atanas Ignatov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Atanas Ignatov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Atanas Ignatov. The network helps show where Atanas Ignatov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Atanas Ignatov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Atanas Ignatov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Atanas Ignatov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Atanas Ignatov. Atanas Ignatov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | Mass spectrometry methods for standardization of allergenic preparations | 0 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 109 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | [Radioisotope diagnosis of changes in the bones of the foot in diabetes]. | 1 |
About Atanas Ignatov
Atanas Ignatov is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Cancer Research, having authored 133 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (36 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (29 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (395 citations), Cancer Research (534 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (297 citations). Atanas Ignatov has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Poland and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Tanja Ignatov, Holm Eggemann, Serban Dan Costa, Thomas Kalinski, Olaf Ortmann, Albert Roessner, Elke Burger, Joachim Bischoff, Christine Weißenborn and Hubert Schaller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Neuroscience and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.