Astha Jain
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Sundaram NatarajanSobha SivaprasadRadhika KrishnanSandeep SaxenaCarsten H. MeyerVinay K. KhannaRajendra Kumar ShuklaLevent Akduman
- Topics
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments (9 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers)Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaRetinaJAMA Ophthalmology
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Astha Jain
18 papers receiving 326 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Ophthalmology 235
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 197
- Molecular Biology 33
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 25
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 24
Countries citing papers authored by Astha Jain
This map shows the geographic impact of Astha Jain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Astha Jain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Astha Jain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Astha Jain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Astha Jain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Astha Jain. The network helps show where Astha Jain may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Astha Jain
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Astha Jain. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Astha Jain based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Astha Jain. Astha Jain is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 143 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | Increased Serum N-CML, VEGF and ICAM-1 is Associated with Photoreceptor Inner Segment Ellipsoid Disruption in Diabetic | 0 |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Astha Jain
Astha Jain is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, General Social Sciences and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 21 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (235 citations), Health Informatics (15 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (197 citations). Astha Jain has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sundaram Natarajan, Sobha Sivaprasad, Radhika Krishnan, Sandeep Saxena, Carsten H. Meyer, Vinay K. Khanna, Rajendra Kumar Shukla, Levent Akduman, S. M. Natu and Peter Kružliak. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Retina and JAMA Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.