Arvind Diddi

574 total citations
8 papers, 377 citations indexed

About

Arvind Diddi is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Arvind Diddi has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 377 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Communication, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Arvind Diddi's work include Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (3 papers). Arvind Diddi is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (3 papers). Arvind Diddi collaborates with scholars based in United States and Slovenia. Arvind Diddi's co-authors include Robert LaRose, Geri Alumit Zeldes, Frederick Fico, Serena Carpenter, Stephen Lacy and Esther Thorson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly and Mass Communication & Society.

In The Last Decade

Arvind Diddi

8 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Arvind Diddi United States 7 274 250 55 50 45 8 377
Paul S. Voakes United States 10 191 0.7× 350 1.4× 18 0.3× 26 0.5× 55 1.2× 17 475
Charlotte Wien Denmark 8 152 0.6× 128 0.5× 18 0.3× 15 0.3× 24 0.5× 30 304
Pamela Jo Brubaker United States 9 207 0.8× 145 0.6× 33 0.6× 30 0.6× 33 0.7× 22 349
Thomas Hargrove United States 6 230 0.8× 172 0.7× 16 0.3× 32 0.6× 12 0.3× 12 327
David L. Swanson United States 7 183 0.7× 236 0.9× 36 0.7× 106 2.1× 63 1.4× 8 431
Tanjev Schultz Germany 7 199 0.7× 305 1.2× 11 0.2× 20 0.4× 20 0.4× 27 402
June Woong Rhee South Korea 8 244 0.9× 279 1.1× 14 0.3× 23 0.5× 17 0.4× 50 403
Ruth Avidar Israel 10 154 0.6× 223 0.9× 30 0.5× 13 0.3× 12 0.3× 24 342
Rebecca Coates Nee United States 8 134 0.5× 183 0.7× 11 0.2× 33 0.7× 41 0.9× 15 283
Klaus Schönbach Netherlands 11 152 0.6× 227 0.9× 12 0.2× 21 0.4× 23 0.5× 37 325

Countries citing papers authored by Arvind Diddi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arvind Diddi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arvind Diddi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arvind Diddi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arvind Diddi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arvind Diddi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arvind Diddi. The network helps show where Arvind Diddi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arvind Diddi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arvind Diddi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arvind Diddi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arvind Diddi. Arvind Diddi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Diddi, Arvind, Frederick Fico, & Geri Alumit Zeldes. (2014). Partisan Balance and Bias in TV Network Coverage of the 2000, 2004, and 2008 Presidential Elections. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 58(2). 161–178. 6 indexed citations
2.
Zeldes, Geri Alumit, Frederick Fico, & Arvind Diddi. (2012). Differences in the Way Broadcast, Cable and Public TV Reporters Used Women and Non-White Sources to Cover the 2008 Presidential Race. Mass Communication & Society. 15(6). 831–851. 16 indexed citations
3.
Fico, Frederick, Geri Alumit Zeldes, Serena Carpenter, & Arvind Diddi. (2008). Broadcast and Cable Network News Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election: An Assessment of Partisan and Structural Imbalance. Mass Communication & Society. 11(3). 319–339. 18 indexed citations
4.
Zeldes, Geri Alumit, Frederick Fico, Serena Carpenter, & Arvind Diddi. (2008). Partisan Balance and Bias in Network Coverage of the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 52(4). 563–580. 17 indexed citations
5.
Zeldes, Geri Alumit, Frederick Fico, & Arvind Diddi. (2007). Race and Gender: An Analysis of the Sources and Reporters in Local Television Coverage of the 2002 Michigan Gubernatorial Campaign. Mass Communication & Society. 10(3). 345–363. 26 indexed citations
6.
Lacy, Stephen, Arvind Diddi, & Esther Thorson. (2006). Small Dailies' Profit Margins Half Those of Medium Dailies. Newspaper Research Journal. 27(3). 22–36. 3 indexed citations
7.
Diddi, Arvind & Robert LaRose. (2006). Getting Hooked on News: Uses and Gratifications and the Formation of News Habits Among College Students in an Internet Environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 50(2). 193–210. 281 indexed citations
8.
Fico, Frederick, Geri Alumit Zeldes, & Arvind Diddi. (2004). Partisan and Structural Balance of Local Television Election Coverage of Incumbent and Open Gubernatorial Elections. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 81(4). 897–910. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026