Arturo Chayet

2.1k total citations
59 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Arturo Chayet is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Arturo Chayet has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 39 papers in Ophthalmology and 30 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Arturo Chayet's work include Corneal surgery and disorders (50 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (29 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (27 papers). Arturo Chayet is often cited by papers focused on Corneal surgery and disorders (50 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (29 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (27 papers). Arturo Chayet collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Israel. Arturo Chayet's co-authors include Miguel Montes, David Zadok, Nora Robledo, Kerry K. Assil, Sujal Shah, James D. Brandt, David J. Schanzlin, Ronald J. Smith, Stuart I. Brown and Sandy T. Feldman and has published in prestigious journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Arturo Chayet

58 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Arturo Chayet United States 25 1.4k 1.2k 724 358 37 59 1.6k
László Módis Hungary 21 1.2k 0.9× 1.1k 0.9× 645 0.9× 310 0.9× 21 0.6× 62 1.4k
Richard Potvin United States 25 1.4k 1.0× 1.5k 1.3× 1.2k 1.7× 441 1.2× 63 1.7× 95 1.8k
Mitchell P. Weikert United States 27 2.1k 1.5× 2.1k 1.8× 1.4k 1.9× 414 1.2× 41 1.1× 58 2.5k
Francesco Carones Italy 25 1.4k 1.0× 1.2k 1.0× 594 0.8× 460 1.3× 57 1.5× 66 1.6k
Steven C. Schallhorn United States 29 2.1k 1.5× 1.9k 1.6× 1.3k 1.7× 496 1.4× 23 0.6× 87 2.4k
Jaime Javaloy Spain 29 1.6k 1.2× 1.4k 1.1× 813 1.1× 475 1.3× 17 0.5× 56 1.9k
Pedro Arriola‐Villalobos Spain 22 782 0.6× 1.1k 0.9× 125 0.2× 446 1.2× 36 1.0× 65 1.4k
Michael K. Smolek United States 24 1.5k 1.1× 1.0k 0.9× 703 1.0× 577 1.6× 13 0.4× 42 1.7k
Tudor Tepelus United States 19 724 0.5× 843 0.7× 97 0.1× 204 0.6× 15 0.4× 35 1.0k
Ji Won Jung South Korea 16 452 0.3× 442 0.4× 140 0.2× 412 1.2× 75 2.0× 52 759

Countries citing papers authored by Arturo Chayet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arturo Chayet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arturo Chayet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arturo Chayet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arturo Chayet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arturo Chayet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arturo Chayet. The network helps show where Arturo Chayet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arturo Chayet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arturo Chayet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arturo Chayet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arturo Chayet. Arturo Chayet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chayet, Arturo, et al.. (2023). Pupil Dilation Evaluation of Two Mydriatic Dosing Profiles Delivered By the Optejet ®. Therapeutic Delivery. 14(2). 93–103.
2.
Molokhia, Sarah, et al.. (2020). IVMED 80 eye drops for treatment of keratoconus in patients -Phase 1/2a. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 61(7). 2587–2587. 5 indexed citations
3.
Holliday, Keith, et al.. (2016). Structural Changes Induced by a Corneal Shape-Changing Inlay, Deduced From Optical Coherence Tomography and Wavefront Measurements. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(9). OCT154–OCT154. 9 indexed citations
4.
Holliday, Keith, et al.. (2014). The Effect of Pupil Size and Decentration from Pupil Center on Visual Outcomes after Corneal Inlay Surgery for Presbyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 1545–1545. 2 indexed citations
5.
Lang, Alan, et al.. (2013). Bilateral Implantation of Hydrogel Corneal Inlays in Hyperopic Presbyopes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 3129–3129. 1 indexed citations
6.
Lang, Alan, et al.. (2013). Near Functional Range of a Near Center Hydrogel Corneal Inlay in Presbyopic Subjects. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 3130–3130. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lang, Alan, et al.. (2012). Clinical Performance of a Hydrogel Corneal Inlay in Hyperopic Presbyopes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(14). 4056–4056. 3 indexed citations
8.
Lang, Alan, et al.. (2012). A Hydrogel Corneal Inlay in Emmetropic Presbyopes: Unlocking Patient Satisfaction with Multivariate Statistical Methods. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(14). 4055–4055. 1 indexed citations
9.
Lichtinger, Alejandro, Tracy L. Purcell, David J. Schanzlin, & Arturo Chayet. (2011). Gabapentin for Postoperative Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 27(8). 613–617. 36 indexed citations
10.
Holliday, Keith, et al.. (2011). Concurrent Use of the ReVision Optics Intracorneal Inlay with LASIK to Improve Visual Acuity at All Distances in Hyperopic Presbyopes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(14). 5765–5765. 4 indexed citations
11.
Chayet, Arturo, et al.. (2010). Use of the light-adjustable lens to correct astigmatism after cataract surgery. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 94(6). 690–692. 25 indexed citations
12.
Holliday, Keith, et al.. (2008). Clinical Efficacy of the PRESBYLENS® Intracorneal Inlay for the Correction of Presbyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 3353–3353. 1 indexed citations
13.
Dougherty, Paul J., et al.. (2008). Topographically guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using a customized aspherical treatment zone. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 34(11). 1862–1871. 16 indexed citations
14.
Torres, Luis F., et al.. (2007). Early Postoperative Pain Following Epi-LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Prospective, Comparative, Bilateral Study. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 23(2). 126–132. 48 indexed citations
15.
Zadok, David, et al.. (2006). Outcome of simultaneous phakic implantable contact lens removal with cataract extraction and pseudophakic intraocular lens implantation. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 32(4). 595–598. 19 indexed citations
16.
Chayet, Arturo. (2001). Bitoric laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of simple myopic and mixed astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 108(2). 303–308. 33 indexed citations
17.
Shah, Sujal, David Zadok, Arturo Chayet, et al.. (2001). Stability after laser in situ keratomileusis in moderately and extremely myopic eyes. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 27(7). 1007–1012. 63 indexed citations
18.
Zadok, David, et al.. (2000). Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Ophthalmology. 107(6). 1132–1137. 55 indexed citations
20.
Frucht‐Pery, Joseph, Arturo Chayet, Sandy T. Feldman, Steven Lin, & Stuart I. Brown. (1989). The Effect of Doxycycline on Ocular Rosacea. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 107(4). 434–435. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026