Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Functional Anorectal Disorders
2006543 citationsAdil E. Bharucha, Arnold Wald et al.Gastroenterologyprofile →
Anorectal Disorders
2016313 citationsSatish S.C. Rao, Adil E. Bharucha et al.Gastroenterologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Arnold Wald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arnold Wald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arnold Wald more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arnold Wald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arnold Wald. The network helps show where Arnold Wald may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arnold Wald
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arnold Wald.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arnold Wald based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Arnold Wald. Arnold Wald is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cash, Brooks D., Eugene Chang, Nicholas J. Talley, & Arnold Wald. (2007). Fresh perspectives in chronic constipation and other functional bowel disorders.. PubMed. 7(3). 116–33.4 indexed citations
6.
Parkman, Henry P., Satish S.C. Rao, James C. Reynolds, et al.. (2003). Neurotrophin-3 Improves Functional Constipation. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 98(6). 1338–1347.59 indexed citations
7.
Whitehead, William E., Arnold Wald, & Nancy J. Norton. (2001). Treatment options for fecal incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 44(1). 131–142.157 indexed citations
Müller‐Lissner, S., D C C Bartolo, John Christiansen, et al.. (1998). Interobserver agreement in defecography--an international study.. PubMed. 36(4). 273–9.28 indexed citations
10.
Wald, Arnold. (1995). Incontinence and anorectal dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus.. PubMed. 7(8). 737–9.13 indexed citations
11.
Wald, Arnold. (1994). Pathophysiology and management of fecal incontinence.. PubMed. 59(2). 139–46.
12.
Wald, Arnold. (1994). Colonic and anorectal motility testing in clinical practice.. PubMed. 89(12). 2109–15.36 indexed citations
Wald, Arnold, et al.. (1977). Effect of indomethacin on cholera-induced fluid movement, unidirectional sodium fluxes, and intestinal cAMP.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 72(1). 106–10.54 indexed citations
19.
Wald, Arnold. (1954). Os Privilégios Jurisdicionais Britânicos no Brasil. Revista do Serviço Público. 3(2). 127–128.
20.
Wald, Arnold, et al.. (1952). Hypervitaminosis A. The Journal of Pediatrics. 41(2). 198–201.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.