This map shows the geographic impact of Armin Stein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Armin Stein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Armin Stein more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Armin Stein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Armin Stein. The network helps show where Armin Stein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Armin Stein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Armin Stein.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Armin Stein based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Armin Stein. Armin Stein is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brocke, Jan vom, et al.. (2015). Grand Societal Challenges in Information Systems Research and Education: Ideas from the ERCIS Virtual Seminar Series.4 indexed citations
Becker, Jörg, et al.. (2010). Towards a Maturity Model for Research Portals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 38.8 indexed citations
10.
Becker, Jörg, et al.. (2010). Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Internetwerkzeugs zur Generierung von Forschungsportalen. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik. 1473–1484.2 indexed citations
11.
Knackstedt, Ralf, Armin Stein, & Jörg Becker. (2009). Modellierung integrierter Produktion und Dienstleistung mit dem SCOR-Modell – Bestehende Ansätze und Entwicklungsperspektiven. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK. 119–128.6 indexed citations
12.
Knackstedt, Ralf, et al.. (2009). Towards a reference model for online research maps. European Conference on Information Systems. 2315–2326.9 indexed citations
13.
Becker, Jörg, et al.. (2009). Towards increased comparability of conceptual models - Enforcing naming conventions through domain thesauri and linguistic grammars. European Conference on Information Systems. 2231–2242.15 indexed citations
14.
Delfmann, Patrick, et al.. (2009). Pattern Matching in Conceptual Models – A Formal Multi-Modelling Language Approach.3 indexed citations
15.
Becker, Jörg, et al.. (2008). Ontology Support for Configurative Reference Modeling. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1668–1679.1 indexed citations
16.
Beverungen, Daniel, et al.. (2008). Konfigurative Prozessmodellierung der hybriden Leistungserstellung in Unternehmensnetzwerken des Maschinen- und Anlagenbaus. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik.6 indexed citations
17.
Delfmann, Patrick, et al.. (2008). Eine Methode zur formalen Spezifikation und Umsetzung von Bezeichnungskonventionen für fachkonzeptionelle Informationsmodelle. 23–38.3 indexed citations
18.
Becker, Jörg, Ralf Knackstedt, & Armin Stein. (2007). Extending the Supply Chain Operations Reference Model: Potentials and their Tool Support. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1827–1838.1 indexed citations
19.
Stein, Armin, et al.. (2004). Definition and identification of vague spatial objects and their use in decision ontologies. University of Twente Research Information. 99–115.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.