Arkebe Oqubay
About
In The Last Decade
Arkebe Oqubay
5 papers receiving 99 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Political Science and International Relations 34
- Economics and Econometrics 32
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 31
- Strategy and Management 30
- Development 28
Countries citing papers authored by Arkebe Oqubay
This map shows the geographic impact of Arkebe Oqubay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arkebe Oqubay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arkebe Oqubay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arkebe Oqubay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arkebe Oqubay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arkebe Oqubay. The network helps show where Arkebe Oqubay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arkebe Oqubay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arkebe Oqubay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arkebe Oqubay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arkebe Oqubay. Arkebe Oqubay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Made in Africa: Industrial Policy in Ethiopia | 33 |
| 5 | 78 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.