A.R. Eikelboom

618 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 337 citations indexed

About

A.R. Eikelboom is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Control and Systems Engineering and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, A.R. Eikelboom has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 337 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Social Psychology, 3 papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 3 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in A.R. Eikelboom's work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (3 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (2 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers). A.R. Eikelboom is often cited by papers focused on Complex Systems and Decision Making (3 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (2 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers). A.R. Eikelboom collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and Norway. A.R. Eikelboom's co-authors include J.E. Korteling, Rudy Boonekamp, Romy Blankendaal, José H. Kerstholt, Reinoud D. Stoel, Jan Maarten Schraagen, G.M. te Brake and T. Lamballais Tessensohn and has published in prestigious journals such as Forensic Science International, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making and Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.

In The Last Decade

A.R. Eikelboom

9 papers receiving 314 citations

Hit Papers

Human- versus Artificial Intelligence 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A.R. Eikelboom Netherlands 5 96 83 58 37 33 9 337
Romy Blankendaal Netherlands 4 93 1.0× 83 1.0× 28 0.5× 34 0.9× 19 0.6× 4 278
Rudy Boonekamp Netherlands 4 95 1.0× 83 1.0× 26 0.4× 34 0.9× 20 0.6× 8 308
Andrew Nam United States 5 224 2.3× 47 0.6× 21 0.4× 16 0.4× 24 0.7× 10 431
Tobias Huber Germany 8 152 1.6× 44 0.5× 48 0.8× 6 0.2× 19 0.6× 14 274
Sungwoo Lee South Korea 3 115 1.2× 25 0.3× 61 1.1× 6 0.2× 35 1.1× 4 296
Valdemar Danry United States 8 106 1.1× 34 0.4× 51 0.9× 5 0.1× 29 0.9× 19 364
Upol Ehsan United States 12 319 3.3× 98 1.2× 38 0.7× 8 0.2× 35 1.1× 21 508
Zana Buçinca United States 6 279 2.9× 106 1.3× 114 2.0× 10 0.3× 26 0.8× 12 471
Memo Akten United Kingdom 3 125 1.3× 50 0.6× 15 0.3× 7 0.2× 48 1.5× 4 370
Amna Khan Pakistan 4 62 0.6× 25 0.3× 45 0.8× 6 0.2× 19 0.6× 25 307

Countries citing papers authored by A.R. Eikelboom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.R. Eikelboom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.R. Eikelboom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.R. Eikelboom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.R. Eikelboom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.R. Eikelboom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.R. Eikelboom. The network helps show where A.R. Eikelboom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.R. Eikelboom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.R. Eikelboom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.R. Eikelboom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A.R. Eikelboom. A.R. Eikelboom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Korteling, J.E., et al.. (2021). Human- versus Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. 4. 622364–622364. 263 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Eikelboom, A.R., et al.. (2021). Mixed-initiative Approaches in the Design of a trusted shift of Coordination Forms: Supporting Collaboration to handle Imperfect Partners. 2021 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME). 1–9. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kerstholt, José H., et al.. (2019). Automation as an intelligent teammate: social psychological implications. TNO Repository. 3 indexed citations
4.
Tessensohn, T. Lamballais, et al.. (2018). How to Cooperate with Intelligent Machines: Lessons for Defence Operations from the Integration of AI and Robotics across Multiple Domains. 3 indexed citations
5.
Eikelboom, A.R., et al.. (2014). Collaborative Decision Making Process for Complex Defense, Security and Stability Challenges. 2 indexed citations
6.
Kerstholt, José H., et al.. (2010). Does suggestive information cause a confirmation bias in bullet comparisons?. Forensic Science International. 198(1-3). 138–142. 34 indexed citations
7.
Kerstholt, José H. & A.R. Eikelboom. (2007). Effects of prior interpretation on situation assessment in crime analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 20(5). 455–465. 17 indexed citations
8.
Schraagen, Jan Maarten, et al.. (2005). Experimental Evaluation of a Critical Thinking Tool to Support Decision Making in Crisis Situations. TNO Repository. 181–189. 6 indexed citations
9.
Schraagen, Jan Maarten, et al.. (2005). Supporting Decision Making by a Critical Thinking Tool. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 49(3). 517–521. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026