Anupam Mukherjee
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mamta Chawla‐SarkarRatna B. RayParikshit BagchiShubham ShrivastavaRanjit RayShiladitya ChattopadhyayNobumichi KobayashiAnwesha Banerjee
- Topics
- Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (22 papers)Animal Virus Infections Studies (12 papers)HIV Research and Treatment (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Anupam Mukherjee
65 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Infectious Diseases 639
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 323
- Molecular Biology 314
- Animal Science and Zoology 300
- Epidemiology 265
Countries citing papers authored by Anupam Mukherjee
This map shows the geographic impact of Anupam Mukherjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anupam Mukherjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anupam Mukherjee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anupam Mukherjee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anupam Mukherjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anupam Mukherjee. The network helps show where Anupam Mukherjee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anupam Mukherjee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anupam Mukherjee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anupam Mukherjee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anupam Mukherjee. Anupam Mukherjee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | An in-vitro Study to Evaluate the Anti-Bacterial Activity of Rauvolfia serpentina against Escherichia coli | 2 |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 53 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 56 |
About Anupam Mukherjee
Anupam Mukherjee is a scholar working on Virology, Infectious Diseases and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (22 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (12 papers) and HIV Research and Treatment (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (639 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (300 citations) and Hepatology (219 citations). Anupam Mukherjee has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Mamta Chawla‐Sarkar, Ratna B. Ray, Parikshit Bagchi, Shubham Shrivastava, Ranjit Ray, Shiladitya Chattopadhyay, Nobumichi Kobayashi, Anwesha Banerjee, Dipanjan Dutta and Adrian M. Di Bisceglie. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.